kinok1
Established
Wow.
A lot of hate in the air. Feels like it at least.
With all the noise surrounding the m8, the reviews of the m8, the complaints about the m8, and the praises – I thought I would throw in my 2 cents.
I take photos for a living.
Ah. Much better. Get that out of the way.
And.
I take photos of people who are usually doing what they love – music or modeling.
I don’t shoot for a wire service. Much respect to those that do.
I don’t shoot war zones. Much respect to those that do.
I don’t shoot pap. They can all F off and die.
Here are my thoughts on the m8.
I’ve said it to many friends (even some enemies). Its noisier than my m6. It has a crop factor. I’ve heard it freezes up. Its slow to start up.
All true.
Its not perfect.
But neither am I.
I do love that its small. Im not on some red carpet line with a bunch of other photogs (if you can call them that) blasting images of tori spelling for the next US Weekly (or whatever cover). I find myself backstage. Fly on the wall. And a Nikon ‘D-whatever’ or the Canon ‘Whatever-D’ just aint gonna be appropriate. Too big, too black, too…obnoxious.
Now the m8 does well for the other part of my shooting life - Live concerts. I never shoot over 320, so I cant comment. But it takes the leica glass, and that’s what is important.
I have the best stuff Nikon makes. Don’t shoot canon, but its all the same. Leica glass looks different. It just does. And I don’t care if it’s a piece of celluloid or some Kodak cropped sensor. The images feel different.
And publicists, art buyers, creative directors, and execs all tell me so. And its not like I hear ‘hey is that an m8’, but the way when they go thru my selects and pull their favs there are always more that have been shot with the m8 than my d3.
Always.
Attached are 3 photos. One cd cover that is being given away at a national retail stores as a free gift. The other band press material.
All shot with the m8.
Thanks leica.
A lot of hate in the air. Feels like it at least.
With all the noise surrounding the m8, the reviews of the m8, the complaints about the m8, and the praises – I thought I would throw in my 2 cents.
I take photos for a living.
Ah. Much better. Get that out of the way.
And.
I take photos of people who are usually doing what they love – music or modeling.
I don’t shoot for a wire service. Much respect to those that do.
I don’t shoot war zones. Much respect to those that do.
I don’t shoot pap. They can all F off and die.
Here are my thoughts on the m8.
I’ve said it to many friends (even some enemies). Its noisier than my m6. It has a crop factor. I’ve heard it freezes up. Its slow to start up.
All true.
Its not perfect.
But neither am I.
I do love that its small. Im not on some red carpet line with a bunch of other photogs (if you can call them that) blasting images of tori spelling for the next US Weekly (or whatever cover). I find myself backstage. Fly on the wall. And a Nikon ‘D-whatever’ or the Canon ‘Whatever-D’ just aint gonna be appropriate. Too big, too black, too…obnoxious.
Now the m8 does well for the other part of my shooting life - Live concerts. I never shoot over 320, so I cant comment. But it takes the leica glass, and that’s what is important.
I have the best stuff Nikon makes. Don’t shoot canon, but its all the same. Leica glass looks different. It just does. And I don’t care if it’s a piece of celluloid or some Kodak cropped sensor. The images feel different.
And publicists, art buyers, creative directors, and execs all tell me so. And its not like I hear ‘hey is that an m8’, but the way when they go thru my selects and pull their favs there are always more that have been shot with the m8 than my d3.
Always.
Attached are 3 photos. One cd cover that is being given away at a national retail stores as a free gift. The other band press material.
All shot with the m8.
Thanks leica.