Nice...I will post some of my first ones later tonight.
I scanned a print at 1200 and a neg at 3200
the print scanned much lighter than it looks. I added back a bit of contrast so it looked great on the monitor and looked close to the physical print but when it went to flikr it got a bit darker. I printed this at a grade 3 so it is a bit contrasty.
Honestly I am not sure what this can tell you. The scan looks great and I did nothing to it in post....straight scan off of the v700 with the onboard softwear, scanned as a B+W in 48bit color then inverted to B+W in LR3. I can see some difference between the two but the diffeence is very noticable when it is in your hand!
I see more skin detail in the print but the scan of the neg came across as sharper. I blame that fully on my scanning of the print. Under a loupe it is much, much sharper than the scan of the neg
hmmm pointing out the obvious... As the OP noted "I can see some difference between the two but the diffeence is very noticable when it is in your hand!"
Both processes being totally different will provide different results but some level of information is imparted whereas no images provides no information. I take I take all the information i can get.
I agree...it looks great when in your hand, sort of faded when scanned into LR3, great again when added contrast in LR3 then over contrasted when mported to flikr 🙂
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.