urban_alchemist
Well-known
So, I arrived back from honeymoon to find a large box - within which was the little lump that is the X100. First impressions were ok, if not great - this is no Leica M9. It feels solid, but I'd stop short of many of the extreme hyperbole some have tossed at it: overall I'd put the build-quality beneath that of the Ricoh GXR; somewhere between it and the Panasonic GF-1. The included strap is just plain nasty, in touch, look and pungent smell. It was quickly replaced by the leather one included with the case: both well designed and comfortable in use.
During the day I shot about 100 images, using the OVF and EVF. I shot in RAW and JPEG, the images shown are the latter; forgive me, but I'm not going to be going near Silkypix at all. I'd much prefer to wait till Apple includes the .RAF files in an update soon.
So... to the important bits. What's it like?
Put simply: good, but far from perfect.
The OVF is definitely the star. Set up with grids, dof scale, and level, it is an absolute pleasure. I wish I could trust the AF more (more on that later) - if it was a case of a-nail-a-time, this would be the single best non-rangefinder system out there.
The EVF too is very good when necessary; comparable to both the GF-1 and GXR.
The shutter is completely silent. Auto-review is done in the VF. No-one will ever need to know that you've taken a photo - much of the time YOU won't know you've taken the photo! However, this requires you're in silent mode. More on that later too.
So what's the bad?
The only one that really worries me is the focus. You focus by pointing a centre 'blob' towards your subject, waiting for it to light green and the recomposing. All well and good, but the blob is quite big. Many times (~50%) I thought I'd nailed it, but the focus was just a little soft, either spilling out on the side, or just getting the depth completely wrong. My suggestion to Fuji? Add a spot-focus system as an option...
Othe problems involve the controls and the software. Let me say this simply: the control dial is Horrible (with a capital H). You just can't use it without knockign something you don't want to. The RAW button needs to be customisable, too (Fn is set to ISO by default; you'll need an ND button as well).
Silent mode is limited - for some unfathomable reason you can't adjust macro or flash without exiting it.
None of the settings are sticky (go into Aperture Priority and suddenly that photo you took last night at 3200 ISO will mean that your photo is completely blown out).
Auto ISO is sunk somewhere deep in a menu - not on the soft Fn key you set up.
So, to the images. I don't really think it's fair to judge the OOC J-pegs, as it'll be much more interesting to judge the RAW files once they're accessible. Velvia-setting seems a bit less punchy than the legendary slide film, and the camera seems to have a tendency to over-expose slightly (again - shouldn't be an issue with RAW). All photos are ISO 200... make of them what you will...
Am I elated? A bit. Am I disappointed? A bit. My M9 is heading back to Solms this week for a CLA and so I'll be alone with my X100 for my trip to Venice next week. I guess I'll have a much better idea of what it's all about then...
During the day I shot about 100 images, using the OVF and EVF. I shot in RAW and JPEG, the images shown are the latter; forgive me, but I'm not going to be going near Silkypix at all. I'd much prefer to wait till Apple includes the .RAF files in an update soon.
So... to the important bits. What's it like?
Put simply: good, but far from perfect.
The OVF is definitely the star. Set up with grids, dof scale, and level, it is an absolute pleasure. I wish I could trust the AF more (more on that later) - if it was a case of a-nail-a-time, this would be the single best non-rangefinder system out there.
The EVF too is very good when necessary; comparable to both the GF-1 and GXR.
The shutter is completely silent. Auto-review is done in the VF. No-one will ever need to know that you've taken a photo - much of the time YOU won't know you've taken the photo! However, this requires you're in silent mode. More on that later too.
So what's the bad?
The only one that really worries me is the focus. You focus by pointing a centre 'blob' towards your subject, waiting for it to light green and the recomposing. All well and good, but the blob is quite big. Many times (~50%) I thought I'd nailed it, but the focus was just a little soft, either spilling out on the side, or just getting the depth completely wrong. My suggestion to Fuji? Add a spot-focus system as an option...
Othe problems involve the controls and the software. Let me say this simply: the control dial is Horrible (with a capital H). You just can't use it without knockign something you don't want to. The RAW button needs to be customisable, too (Fn is set to ISO by default; you'll need an ND button as well).
Silent mode is limited - for some unfathomable reason you can't adjust macro or flash without exiting it.
None of the settings are sticky (go into Aperture Priority and suddenly that photo you took last night at 3200 ISO will mean that your photo is completely blown out).
Auto ISO is sunk somewhere deep in a menu - not on the soft Fn key you set up.
So, to the images. I don't really think it's fair to judge the OOC J-pegs, as it'll be much more interesting to judge the RAW files once they're accessible. Velvia-setting seems a bit less punchy than the legendary slide film, and the camera seems to have a tendency to over-expose slightly (again - shouldn't be an issue with RAW). All photos are ISO 200... make of them what you will...
Am I elated? A bit. Am I disappointed? A bit. My M9 is heading back to Solms this week for a CLA and so I'll be alone with my X100 for my trip to Venice next week. I guess I'll have a much better idea of what it's all about then...