XE1 Arrived - Loving it - Photos and M-Lenses

DRabbit said:
There's no setting I know of to preset focus to a certain distance. However, you could easily set it via autofocus and then flip the switch to MF to hold it there. The switch for AFS/AFC/MF is on the front of the camera. With older manual focus lenses, you could also use the distance scale.
Click to expand...

Yes, there IS an easy way to do this. Set the camera to manual focus mode first. Then simply point the camera at some object that's located at the distance you'd like to use for zone focus (for street photography, I point my XPro1 at a spot about 3 paces in front of me on the ground and then press the AE-L/AF-L button. It instantly locks the lens at that distance. Presto... zone focused! 🙂
 
Jamie Pillers said:
Yes, there IS an easy way to do this. Set the camera to manual focus mode first. Then simply point the camera at some object that's located at the distance you'd like to use for zone focus (for street photography, I point my XPro1 at a spot about 3 paces in front of me on the ground and then press the AE-L/AF-L button. It instantly locks the lens at that distance. Presto... zone focused! 🙂
Click to expand...

Another method. Cycle the "display/back" button until u c the distance scale at bottom... Use manual focus ring to set distance. U can c the depth of field indicators change as u change f stop..

Gary
 
Jamie Pillers said:
Ah... didn't know about that one. I'll have to try it out tomorrow. Thanks, Gary.
Click to expand...

Also in the submenu for customizing the display info, u can turn off things u don't want to c.

If u don't c the distance scale, it could be disabled. Use that menu to activate.

Gary
 
DRabbit said:
It is a nice looking camera! I know ultimately it's image quality that matters, but hey, it's a great bonus when the camera looks good too 😉

Really, it's so close in size to the x100 the difference in negligible... quite a bit smaller than the xPro1, which is probably good for some people, but not others (big hands).

AF speed on the 35 f/1.4 is pretty good. I find it fast enough. Would it be fast enough for street... sometimes? How's that for a vague answer. I don't shoot street often, but have done it with the M8, so AF speed isn't usually the factor that inhibits me.

There's no setting I know of to preset focus to a certain distance. However, you could easily set it via autofocus and then flip the switch to MF to hold it there. The switch for AFS/AFC/MF is on the front of the camera. With older manual focus lenses, you could also use the distance scale.
Click to expand...

With the Fuji m adapter u also get lens correction available that Fuji does not allow for third party adapters.

Gary
 
Nice stuff, Amy!

How do you process your raw files, or are you shooting jpeg? And if raw, how would you judge the quality? I found that the X-Trans color filter layout causes problems when converting with Lr / ACR.
 
XE-1 is more like an SLR without optical view finder and I suppose there is no field around the finder image as we have in range finder camera, correct? Then the shooting approach maybe just as in SLR?
Could you elaborate on that aspect?

I have been on the fence and it is hard to resist, at the same time if I go Fuji route, then This type of cameras would replace for many people conventional SLR's eventually and , if I am to get one, my Nikon assembly except long teles.

I might use much less of film range finder (R4A), so I am on the fence of buying a lens or two also.
 
I'm thinking on this camera.

How is the EVF? Is really a pleasure to view the image in the EVF? Some months ago I used a GH2 and I didn't like its EVF... is it very different?

Great shots!
 
Tom,

Framing technique with the EVF is essentially identical to using a DLSR/SLR with a 100% viewfinder.

The EVF deficiencies are most notable in very bright light and very low light. Also, There can be a lag if you pan quickly.

On the plus side, you can include or exclude a great deal of information. I like the focus scale and horizontal level indicator. I don't use the histogram for a couple of reasons. The digital zoom function (3X or 10X) is very useful to confirm the AF focus region and accuracy. The 3X zoom make focusing with analog lenses practical.

I use the OVF on the XP-1 often because I like to see outside of the frame. But I quickly switch to the EVF without hesitation as circumstances dictate.
 
The EVF is VERY good. I will say EVIL/EVF-only mirrorless cameras all take a little getting used to when you've come from years of SLR or rangefinder optical viewfinders... but now that the EVFs are getting so good, it's much less a problem. To make a fair assessment though, you can't make a snap judgement in just one try or a few days... you really have to use them for a couple of weeks to give yourself the chance to get used to an EVF-only camera. The EVFs on the XE1 (along with the latest Olympus cameras and the NEX-7) really are VERY nice. They have their downsides, but so does any viewfinder... it's just giving yourself the time to adjust to it.

Rangefinder and Hybrid OV are the only viewfinders out there that give you framelines, where you get to see that area outside the framing of your photo. The EVF of the XE1 (just like all EVFs) is an eletronic view through the lens... so yes, framing is like that of an SLR. The upside from an SLR is that your see the DOF and exposure in realtime. The downside is that it's not often as responsive (some EVF lag).

I do still own a DSLR... though over the last two years it gets used less and less in favor of EVF/mirrorless cameras... and I still love my M8. Mirrorless is the future, IMO. In a year or two (or three) when mirrorless catches up to SLRs in viewfinder responsiveness and lens availability, there will be little benefit to carrying a big honking DSLR around. The only reason I keep my K-5 at this point, is so that I have it when mirrorless might not do the job - mostly because of lenses. For example, shooting my daughter's theater events when I need a long fast zoom.
 
Sorry I missed your question Felix!
I'm shooting JPG for now. Even on the x100, I was SO pleased with the JPG files that I didn't see the benefit to shooting RAW... and so far that's the case with the XE1. I know I've heard about some "weirdness" with the RAW files from the XPro1 and I just didn't feel like fighting with that either, so for now, I'm sticking with JPG 🙂
 
stompyq said:
Here's the link to the October meetup

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=124475

We meet at puck fair at 1 pm. It looks like this months meetup will be on Saturday. I can pm you details if you want, although from LI you might need to get to penn station and take a subway ride.
Click to expand...

Thanks!
I am back and forth to the city SOOO much these days, my god if I could afford to I'd move much closer in there. It's probably easier to drive in, but I'll have to give it some thought. For now, let me say I'll maybe be there... but I'd like to try and make it 🙂

- - - - -

Ezzie - thanks for the sample. The 18mm arrived today, so I'll be anxious to try it out tomorrow.

I tried the Zeiss 35mm f/2 Biogon today, and my initial impression is that I wasn't too impressed. Focusing was easy enough, but it seems there was some smearing on the edges when wide open (which I didn't expect with 35mm)... and I think we all know the Zeiss is capable of sharp sharp sharp images. I actually think on the XE1, the 40mm Nokton did better... but maybe it's too early to tell for sure.

I did test out some of the high ISO capabilities tonight. ISO 1000 was a breeze...

10_18_oohlala.jpg


...and I'd have no fear going right up to ISO 6400 if needed (I didn't try higher than that tonight). Pretty amazing how good the latest cameras are getting with high ISO stuff.... like I said earlier, it's not something I need often, but it's nice to have the option.

Shab: I was always impressed with the IQ of the x100... and I am even more impressed with the XE1. I'd call performance similar, with the edge going to the XE1 -- slightly bigger files and sharper -- at least when shooting wide open -- the x100 wasn't always super sharp at f/2. Of course, that's down to the lenses more than the camera itself. Colors are also very similar... at least they seem to be to me.

The XE1 is a little more responsive overall. Focusing seems faster to me (with the 35mm f/1.4). EVF is better in all ways except maybe in how it wakes from sleep (seems a little slow in bright conditions).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom