Ricoh
Well-known
Huss and Raid, I have an M240 and use a selection of Leica lenses. The limitation is low level photography, or near to the ground. I have the right angle evf (an Olympus version) but live view and focusing is pitiful. Hence my thoughts towards a mirrorless.
shawn
Veteran
Thanks Shawn.
At the moment I’m researching mirrorless cameras (due to flange depth from the sensor) to accept and perform with Leica M glass. My 1st choice would be FF 35mm and I may end up with a Z6 or an A7x.
Below around 35mm you need to be more selective about which lenses you want to use on the mirrorless cameras. Some do well, some will do poorly. Much less of an issue at longer focal lengths. I use my M glass on the A7RII and most of it does well there. With the appropriate adapter it will even AF but I rarely use that.
Leica sensors are tuned for M glass though and there are obvious differences in performance between the M240 and my A7RII with some lenses. You still want to be selective, even with the Leica camera. If you can live with a RF the M240 is a great camera though more limited in what it can do compared to a mirrorless. And 'bulky' means 3.5mm thicker than the later M10, thinner than most/all full frame mirrorless cameras. That extra bulk also means a bigger battery for great battery life.
Shawn
phrons
Established
I really love the Fuji jpegs.
When I shoot my xt2 I capture raw+jpeg, most of the time I save the jpeg, and delete the raw.
When I shoot my xt2 I capture raw+jpeg, most of the time I save the jpeg, and delete the raw.
rfaspen
[insert pithy phrase here]
Love my M240 with all rangefinder lenses. However, I would be hard-pressed to achieve focus at 1.1 on a moving subject in low light no matter the viewfinder type.....optical RF or EVF.
My hat's off to you Huss.
My hat's off to you Huss.
raid
Dad Photographer
XP3 is the accepted abbreviation for the X-Pro3. Nothing confusing at all...unless you can point out another Fuji With the same name.
When I first saw "XP3", I thought of the film XP2.
kshapero
South Florida Man
A response from an RFF'er who is boredXP3 is the accepted abbreviation for the X-Pro3. Nothing confusing at all...unless you can point out another Fuji With the same name.
Just Googled XP3
Sonim XP3 - With Camera
XP3 Curriculum | Orange Students
Xp3 Fuel Treatment – Gasoline and Diesel Additive
Xp3 - Liquipedia Counter-Strike Wiki
XP3 File Extension - What is an .xp3 file and how do I open it?
XpLab Inc. – Xp3
XP3 Corporation - Inventors of the Hornet Electronic Deer
The list goes on and on, but no Fuji X-Pro3
Bill Blackwell
Leica M Shooter
Although I need another 50 like I need another hole in my head, I've been tempted to get the 7A. In fact, if it were not for the clickless stops I'd probably already have one.... If I had to pick just one, it would be the 7A as gives such a nice look to pics. Price is a bonus.
Among its draws to me are its bokeh renditions and the fact it's 6-bit coded. But I have seen copies for sale recently that are NOT 6-bit coded at all! On this lens, for me, that's a deal killer.
Yokosuka Mike
Abstract Clarity
XP3 is the accepted abbreviation for the X-Pro3. Nothing confusing at all...unless you can point out another Fuji With the same name.
When did XP3 become the accepted abbreviation for the X-Pro3?
Why would a name as short as X-Pro3 need to be abbreviated?
I was also confused.
All the best,
Mike
Rayt
Nonplayer Character
I scanned some XP2 last night. Great film.
kshapero
South Florida Man
Me, too. Yes I thought that also.When I first saw "XP3", I thought of the film XP2.![]()
Now, try the Fujifilm 56mm 1.2 and compare!
Huss
Veteran
Now, try the Fujifilm 56mm 1.2 and compare!
1. I already had the 7A 50 1.1 before I acquired the XP3
b. Is it the same type of lens? Focal length is different, lens design is different. Size is different. Price is different. What would I be comparing?
iii. No interest in getting a 56, as I hardly ever would use it. My go to is the 27mm, next up is the 16mm 2.8. I carry the 7A along for those just in case scenarios.
Huss
Veteran
Me, too. Yes I thought that also.
When I first checked out the XP3, I asked to see the X-Tro3 as well. They were confused then handed over an XT3.
kshapero
South Florida Man
Hey I remember that Star Trek episode, too.When I first checked out the XP3, I asked to see the X-Tro3 as well. They were confused then handed over an XT3.
kshapero
South Florida Man
Nice looking rig.
1. I already had the 7A 50 1.1 before I acquired the XP3
b. Is it the same type of lens? Focal length is different, lens design is different. Size is different. Price is different. What would I be comparing?
iii. No interest in getting a 56, as I hardly ever would use it. My go to is the 27mm, next up is the 16mm 2.8. I carry the 7A along for those just in case scenarios.
Ok, sorry to have offended you.
Huss
Veteran
Ok, sorry to have offended you.You take this a bit too seriously. I wasn't trying to say this lens is bad. I was alluding to the fact that the 56mm 1.2 is also a fast lens for Fuji. Very fun lens to use.
Not offended at all! C'mon you know me by now!
Just saying they are not remotely the same kind of lens.
Everything I have heard of the 56 1.2 suggests it is insanely good. A perfect lens.
The 7A is not that.
Huss
Veteran
Nice looking rig.
Thanks! FYI that Fotodiox adapter cost $7 on ebay! (used) And it works perfect.
I use Fotodiox for everything.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.