kemal_mumcu
Well-known
Thanks for all the responses. I think I'm officially confused now. 😛
I'll be souping some more stuff with Xtol again in a week or so and I'll study this thread again before I do. I had a real dog's breakfast of film that I developed a month ago (8rolls incl TMX100, TriX at 320, TriX at 1000 and one roll of Neopan 1600 at 1000) this in a new developer spells disaster and I got off lucky I think. With D76 for over a year in my first year of developing I found that I needed to develop for longer than Kodak was advertising on their site. Maybe I was wrong with something else but this was my conclusion after many rolls of film. I started doing test shots of sunny 16 situations and using them later after development to test my development times. I found with D76 + TriX @15% more development time gave me better results. Correct me if you see a hole in my methodology.
I'll attach two photos from the TMax100 roll and maybe you can tell me what you see.
I'll be souping some more stuff with Xtol again in a week or so and I'll study this thread again before I do. I had a real dog's breakfast of film that I developed a month ago (8rolls incl TMX100, TriX at 320, TriX at 1000 and one roll of Neopan 1600 at 1000) this in a new developer spells disaster and I got off lucky I think. With D76 for over a year in my first year of developing I found that I needed to develop for longer than Kodak was advertising on their site. Maybe I was wrong with something else but this was my conclusion after many rolls of film. I started doing test shots of sunny 16 situations and using them later after development to test my development times. I found with D76 + TriX @15% more development time gave me better results. Correct me if you see a hole in my methodology.
I'll attach two photos from the TMax100 roll and maybe you can tell me what you see.
