Yay, I just joined the Leica club! (is it Black Tie or Casual?)

Bosk

Make photos, not war.
Local time
11:05 AM
Joined
Aug 17, 2006
Messages
202
Location
Ballarat, Australia
Today I snagged my first rangefinder camera, a used M4-2 from Camera Exchange in Melbourne, to go with the 50/2 Summicron I won on eBay a few weeks back.

My first 'Leica Experience' wasn't a great one, I managed to screw up loading the film and ended up being handed back a blank strip from the lab!
Realising my mistake though, I then loaded the next one correctly (must make sure the film is threaded through the spool on the right hand side!) and quickly burned a roll of 24x Superia 100 at the Observation Deck of the Rialto Towers and had them processed- success this time! Resulting shots look a little on the soft side (no scanner yet so can't post them unfortunately) but it could be that I'm used to viewing my shots on screen instead of on paper. I'm looking forward to snapping a roll tomorrow at larger apertures to test out the bokeh of this lens.

It sure is difficult focusing with a rangefinder at first, but I'm already starting to get the hang of it I think. Guesstimating my exposures was also an adventure since I don't own a lightmeter, but I carried a copy of a table of exposure values (found on the web somewhere) to use as a guide, and surprisingly all shots (taken in bright sunlight) looked within a stop of being spot on. I have a Black Cat exposure guide coming in the post which should alleviate the need of spending $200+ on a light meter.

Regarding ergonomics, it's a quirky little design when you're used to chunky Nikon SLRs as I am. Suffice to say it feels DAMN NICE to have solid metal against your skin instead of synthetic plastic. It reminds me of the D1H I used to own, but of course in a much smaller package - a real little solid brick of a camera.
The shutter's slightly noisier than I was expecting (maybe I should get a CLA done ?) and surprisingly was about the same volume as the R2M they had in stock. Speaking of the Bessa, it looks like a GREAT little camera (I get the feeling I'd be 100% satisfied using one) but..... it ain't a Leica and never will be. 😉

Anyway, so far I'm very satisfied with this this camera. Tomorrow it will undergo more 'stress testing' so we'll see how it holds up. (and how I hold up trying to focus, guess exposure and frame composition at the same time!)

I also wanted to say thanks to Stephen from CameraQuest who was very pleasant about allowing me to cancel the order I made for an R3M last week, when I decided I wanted a Leica instead. Those Bessas are really impressive and I could easily imagine myself buying one as a second body sometime after Christmas.
 
welcome and enjoy your purchase it's a fine camera.
FWIW my M4-2 is quieter than my M6 classic....
 
Include yourself, Magus Group-hug I believe...
action-smiley-079.gif
 
Well... so, now you're a Leica man... and you picked a meterless body for your first! 😱

That alone takes guts.

Congratulations on your Leica! Soon enough you'll get further directions about the secret protocols and language all Leica users must comply with. In the meanwhile... look for a Sekonic L208 meter. It won't empty your bank account, and will help you confirm your metering hunches.

Take care! 🙂
 
Welcome aboard! You chose a great Leica model and lens, a classic set up. And I think it is good not to start with a light meter. Instead, bring a small notebook and record your exposures. Then when you review the photographs along side your notes, and knowing the sunny 16 rule, your brain will become the light meter. And the more you shoot with the Leica, it will become an extension of your brain. Just like they say in their ads, but true. Welcome and enjoy!

And you are correct: this is a terrific site, a real community of photographers and rangefinder enthusiasts.
 
Bosk: you have entered a very complex realm. Be warned: your trek will be expensive from now on! I have spent more money on Leica glass than I ever did on anything else in my life. It's worse than candy. You want more *MORE*!

You will find that truffle-filled Belgian chocolate usually trumps flaming-hot Cheetos. I like Cheetos, but that chocolate is "Rated R" 😉

Enjoy!
 
gabrielma said:
Bosk: you have entered a very complex realm. Be warned: your trek will be expensive from now on! I have spent more money on Leica glass than I ever did on anything else in my life. It's worse than candy. You want more *MORE*!
Maybe it's a good thing then that I'm already broke. 😀

Funny though, after only two days with this camera I've already seen quite a lot of situations where a 35 and a 75 would deliver more appropriate framing than the 50 I'm using. The choice for me in the coming months might end up being stick with second hand Leica glass or give Voightlander lenses a try? Definately something I'll want to research quite a bit more before before reaching into my pocket.

The other thing I've noticed is just how EASY it is to judge exposure with negative film. Today I was taking shots at the Melbourne Aquarium where the light (or lack thereof) is very tricky, but 90% of my exposures looked dead-on.
It's a totally different scenario from digital, where you notice if you shot is even half a stop over or under. Better yet, no more obsessing over highlights.... as in blowing them which I find incredibly easy on digital for some reason. The improved dynamic range of film is almost reason enough to switch I reckon.
 
Back
Top Bottom