jlw
Rangefinder camera pedant
Anyone else notice this note on page 125 of the M8 user manual?
I've never heard that one before, but I assume it must apply to other cameras' CCD sensors too. Just think, every time you take your camera on a plane trip, you may arrive at your destination with one or two fewer working pixels than you had when you left.
I think I'll go post this on photo.net and see if I can start a mass panic...
Sensor
Cosmic radiation (e.g. on flights) can cause pixel defects.
Cosmic radiation (e.g. on flights) can cause pixel defects.
I've never heard that one before, but I assume it must apply to other cameras' CCD sensors too. Just think, every time you take your camera on a plane trip, you may arrive at your destination with one or two fewer working pixels than you had when you left.
I think I'll go post this on photo.net and see if I can start a mass panic...
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
Over there? A mass sneering, I'd bet.jlw said:
I heard of that; it would explain for the "new" dead pixels that my 10D got right after my last trip to Europe. I always thought it was a coincidence.
JoeFriday
Agent Provacateur
that's why it's smart to wrap your cameras in tinfoil when taking them on planes.. doesn't hurt to wear a tinfoil cup, too
sf
Veteran
just put the thing in a lead bag.
lmd91343
There's my Proctor-Silex!
JoeFriday said:
Just make sure you don't sit with the sunlight in your lap too long!
I don't know if you are serious about wrapping your camera in tin foil. I would think that any cosmic rays that would pass through the plane's aluminum skin and airframe would pass through tin foil.
I've been looking to buy a digital camera after the first of the year. I had planned to use it for travel. I have to think this through again.
DavidH
Overweight and over here
jlw said:
It's surprising how few people have heard of this...but it can be a very serious problem. I had a TV camera badly affected in a flight to Mexico - had to be repaired by Sony - replacing the CCD chips for a cost of around 5,000 UKP. Most of the big pro tv cameras have an abillity to map out any affected pixels - an extended black balance identifies the pixels. The problem is, a bad hit can leave the camera unable to map out a pixel - leaving a burned white spot (hot pixel) in the image all the time.
Have no idea whether any digital stills camera has the same ability but I doubt it at the consumer end of the market at least.
And insurance cover may be an issue.
Of course, if it was a common problem...you'd have heard of it already.
My Nikon D70 has travelled the world with me for the last 18 months (5 continents and more countries than I can remember - some 28 airline flights in the last 4 months alone) and hasn't suffered any ill effects...
David
...wondering what all those rays have done to my brain...
Avotius
Some guy
thats interesting, my canon 20D has been on....8 plane trips and never had a problem, what is the cosmic ray bussiness anyway?
Pherdinand
the snow must go on
Use film.
Sparrow
Veteran
The Hubble Telescope’s sensors are still working normaly after how many years? Seems like a manufacturers excuse to me
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
Hubble is slightly more radiation hardened than your average Leica M8.
Also, Hubble's Wide Field and Planetary camera was swapped in 1993. Another replacement was scheduled for 2004, but was cancelled due to the grounding of the Space Shuttle fleet and is now unlikely to take place. Hubble's Faint Object Camera was swapped for the Advanced Camera for Surveys in 2002.
Philipp
Last edited:
Sparrow
Veteran
I was thinking of the CCDs on the optical array, and they have to take the lens cap however much its hardened.
DavidH
Overweight and over here
Sparrow said:
Actually NASA have spent a lot of money and time investigating the dangers to their space borne gear...some of their recent research on HD cameras in orbit puts their life expectancy during active periods at around 9 days...how they get around the problem I don't know.It's a couple of years since I read anything on it but I did ask questions at the time - when you get an invoice for thousands and a bloke giving his routine - intake-of-breath, head shake, "yeah well...cosmic space rays mate..." - you tend to find a sudden interest.
But even if you were very unlucky and got a dead pixel in a stills camera, Photoshop would fix it in an instant. It's only really a problem for moving pictures - 25 or 30 per second over hours/days worth of footage.
It is a genuine phenomenon...but really, really not worth worrying about with regards digital stills cameras.
David
Sparrow
Veteran
Sorry David, I have an odd sense of humour, clearly demonstrated by my posts here. I was just poking genial fun at the more earnest members; it is a character flaw on my part
Regards
Regards
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
Hubble is a mirror telescope. You can harden mirrors all the way. The CCDs don't have to sit with a direct view path to open space.Sparrow said:
Radiation hardening is a big problem in space. If anything, this underlines that statements about cosmic radiation being a danger for camera equipment are true.
Incidentally, Hubble's ACS camera has been dead for three weeks at the moment, though probably not due to CCD failure.
Philipp
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
Pherdinand said:Use film.
And get it slammed by airport x-rays..
DavidH
Overweight and over here
No offence taken at all...I appreciate your humourThe funniest part of the whole episode for me was that Virgin Atlantic's only inflight movie to Mexico City was 'Man on Fire' - a story of violence, murder and kidnap...in Mexico City...
Luckily, only the camera got toasted.
David
Sparrow
Veteran
Philipp
I stand corrected, and reassured that Leica have considered every aspect of operation, it's good to have the disclaimer so soon
I stand corrected, and reassured that Leica have considered every aspect of operation, it's good to have the disclaimer so soon
Last edited:
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
Sadly, no M8s to boldly go where Hasselblad has gone before.Sparrow said:
Philipp