waynec
Established
After many years I finally replaced my Panasonic G1 with a Sony A6000 after reading online reviews from many different sources. While it is smaller then the G1 for my hands, I do like it and am adapting except for it's over extensive menu system, ( although being better organized), and everything but the kitchen sink in incorporated features, which in some cases seem to duplicate what some photo software programs offer.
So far after 3 weeks with the new marveI and on vacation, I see where I could do with alot less features, allowing for faster selections yet retaining the primary ones that drew me to the camera in the first place.
I'm wondering if you think less is more or you need more(?), and what you would change about your camera.
My own needs are simple; Give me a K1000 of digital cameras with a high MP sensor, moveable screen, viewfinder, easy ISO and compensation changes and on board flash. Raw, seperate JPG (what happened to tiff?) and movie. I know I can overlook everything else but it's just bloat ware to me and I'd prefer weather sealing instead.
So far after 3 weeks with the new marveI and on vacation, I see where I could do with alot less features, allowing for faster selections yet retaining the primary ones that drew me to the camera in the first place.
I'm wondering if you think less is more or you need more(?), and what you would change about your camera.
My own needs are simple; Give me a K1000 of digital cameras with a high MP sensor, moveable screen, viewfinder, easy ISO and compensation changes and on board flash. Raw, seperate JPG (what happened to tiff?) and movie. I know I can overlook everything else but it's just bloat ware to me and I'd prefer weather sealing instead.
Last edited: