telenous
Well-known
jano said:
!?melborp a eb ti dlouW
😕 ???esrever ni gnitirw ew era yhw dnA
Zeiss Ikon vs Mamiya 7II
- Thread starter Grego
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 24
- Views 4K
!?melborp a eb ti dlouW
😕 ???esrever ni gnitirw ew era yhw dnA
jano
Evil Bokeh
Nachkebia said:
😀 !yltcaxE
jano
Evil Bokeh
telenous said:
😛 !siht gnitirw ekil tsuJ !thgil wol ni RLT a htiw esopmoc dna sucof ot gniyrt yzarc em evird dlouw tI.
M
Magnus
Guest
It's a 35mm camera, a good one, but still 35mm. The difference between the two must be pretty clear. 35 is no 6x7.
The best 35mm combination will not touch the toes of a mediocre mid-format let alone mamiya 7.
My 40yr old rolleiflex produces better results than my Leica MP with 35 asph. If it's family snapshots you do then the switch will be fine, anything else you will be disappointed, that is if you only own the 35mm and cannot make the choice of which camera to use.
It is smaller, that much is true ....
The best 35mm combination will not touch the toes of a mediocre mid-format let alone mamiya 7.
My 40yr old rolleiflex produces better results than my Leica MP with 35 asph. If it's family snapshots you do then the switch will be fine, anything else you will be disappointed, that is if you only own the 35mm and cannot make the choice of which camera to use.
It is smaller, that much is true ....
HAnkg
Well-known
The Plaubel 67 RF has a 2.8 Nikkor lens. So you get MF with a faster lens that is in the same league as the Mamiyas.
Similar threads
