joey
Established
What's your opinion on these two cameras?
Tarzak
Well-known
Buy them! : )
jlw
Rangefinder camera pedant
I don't know anything about the Zorki, but the Leningrad is a bit quirky. If you can find a good, working one, it has some interesting characteristics. The viewfinder is very bright and clear by '50s FSU standards, and the split-image-only rangefinder works well as long as the subject has clear vertical edges on which to focus. The black framelines for lenses from 50mm through 135mm are even "semi-compensated" for parallax (the image moves horizontally but not vertically as you focus.)
On the downside, one big irritant is that a lot of non-FSU lenses won't fit; the camera mount is a standard L-39 thread, all right, but there's a decorative ridge just above it that physically interferes if you try to screw in a lens that's too fat around the base. When I had a Leningrad, I was annoyed to discover that none of my Canon or Voigtlander lenses would fit.
The other thing that's a bit of a headache is that the sprocketless film-advance system produces uneven frame spacing. At the beginning of a roll the frames almost touch each other, but by the end of a 36-exposure roll the spacing is about twice the normal amount. This isn't a big problem if you process and cut your own negatives, but it drives automatic printing and slide-mounting equipment crazy.
So -- fun camera if you get a working one, and a very interesting design -- but if you're contemplating it for a "user," think hard about whether these limitations would be a problem before you dive in.
On the downside, one big irritant is that a lot of non-FSU lenses won't fit; the camera mount is a standard L-39 thread, all right, but there's a decorative ridge just above it that physically interferes if you try to screw in a lens that's too fat around the base. When I had a Leningrad, I was annoyed to discover that none of my Canon or Voigtlander lenses would fit.
The other thing that's a bit of a headache is that the sprocketless film-advance system produces uneven frame spacing. At the beginning of a roll the frames almost touch each other, but by the end of a 36-exposure roll the spacing is about twice the normal amount. This isn't a big problem if you process and cut your own negatives, but it drives automatic printing and slide-mounting equipment crazy.
So -- fun camera if you get a working one, and a very interesting design -- but if you're contemplating it for a "user," think hard about whether these limitations would be a problem before you dive in.
joey
Established
Thanks for your lengthy comment. I am not going to risk and buy Leningrad - not worth it.
What about Zorki-6, guys?
What about Zorki-6, guys?
W
wlewisiii
Guest
Zorki 6 - good camera overall.
LTM, swing back, lever wind & a quite decent finder. Slap an I-50 collapsible on it and you have a pocketable camera. I find a soft release helps, but that's a classic of the "YMMV" kind of thing.
Two major potential issues - 1) the back latch can be weak. If you're worried, a bit of black rubber electrical tape or the bottom half of a neverready case will keep you safe. 2) No slow speeds. I have never missed them, but you might.
In the end, I'd say it's the second nicest 35mm FSU camera I've owned. But nothing comes close the the Kiev 5 I had... Now that is a magnificent camera. Heavy & ugly, to be sure, but as reliable as a T34 & a d*mn good finder.
Hope this helps.
William
LTM, swing back, lever wind & a quite decent finder. Slap an I-50 collapsible on it and you have a pocketable camera. I find a soft release helps, but that's a classic of the "YMMV" kind of thing.
Two major potential issues - 1) the back latch can be weak. If you're worried, a bit of black rubber electrical tape or the bottom half of a neverready case will keep you safe. 2) No slow speeds. I have never missed them, but you might.
In the end, I'd say it's the second nicest 35mm FSU camera I've owned. But nothing comes close the the Kiev 5 I had... Now that is a magnificent camera. Heavy & ugly, to be sure, but as reliable as a T34 & a d*mn good finder.
Hope this helps.
William
Nickfed
Well-known
I used a Zorki-6 for forty years. It served me well. The lever wind is not one of its best features and you need to use a bit of gaffer tape to ensure the door doesn't open, but at least it's got a door......
fidget
Lemon magnet
I tightened up the door catch on my Zorki 6, now it takes a little too much effort to get the thing to open. No chance of this opening accidentally. I seperated the top and bottom of the leather case and put new popper studs on to reconnect. This would also protect the door catch.
The Zorki 6 is a nice size for my hands, bigger than a Zorki 1 but smaller than the Zorki 4, FED 3 and the Kievs.
The Zorki 6 is a nice size for my hands, bigger than a Zorki 1 but smaller than the Zorki 4, FED 3 and the Kievs.
joey
Established
I am relatively new to FSU cameras. This is what I've noticed about FSU cameras so far:
The less features an FSU camera has - the more reliable it is. Speaking of cocking levers and light meters.
The fact that you have a brand new camera does not guarantee you will have a working camera. That surprised a little at first.
You need to have a technician to check the camera both new or used. Probably, this is the reason why Oleg Khalyavin is a popular seller among FSU users.
The less features an FSU camera has - the more reliable it is. Speaking of cocking levers and light meters.
The fact that you have a brand new camera does not guarantee you will have a working camera. That surprised a little at first.
You need to have a technician to check the camera both new or used. Probably, this is the reason why Oleg Khalyavin is a popular seller among FSU users.
oscroft
Veteran
Smaller than a Zorki 4 or FED 3 eh? I'd always assumed the Zorki 6 was about Zorki 4 size. Hmm, I think I'm going to have to get oneThe Zorki 6 is a nice size for my hands, bigger than a Zorki 1 but smaller than the Zorki 4, FED 3
mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
While the Zorki 6 is "about" Zorki 4 size, I just checked and the 6 is smaller in all 3 dimensions, most notably height. As noted earlier a collapsible I-50 makes the Zorki 6 a relatively compact (if weighty) package.oscroft said:Smaller than a Zorki 4 or FED 3 eh? I'd always assumed the Zorki 6 was about Zorki 4 size. Hmm, I think I'm going to have to get one![]()
...Mike
vanyagor
Established
I just received a Leningrad 2 days ago. It's an impressive camera! I would say definitely worth the money I payed for it. The viewfinder is amazing: biggest and brightest among all FSU I've seen so far. I would even say that is's as bright as my Leica M3
The rangefinder window is not semitrasparent though. It's a split viewfinder (I think that's how it's called).
It also feels very well in the hands, not a cheap look of feds or Zorki 6 ....
I still have to test it though.
It also feels very well in the hands, not a cheap look of feds or Zorki 6 ....
I still have to test it though.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.