jmooney
Guy with a camera
That silver "dot" is interesting ... what's the story?
According to the seller, the previous owner buffed the paint off to make it look more "M3 like." I like it, makes it an interesting piece.
Jim
edho
edho
lobzik
Newbie
I have the leica with scraches and a dent on the top plate endeedlopzik, that's a pretty high filter to lens value ratio you got there with the B+W on the Jupiter! Love the M3, looks nice and clean. I don't think there's a better looking M than a clean chrome M3.
1) you can screw a filter
2) you can safe almost clean coating
3) this filter do not harm a picture (I suppose
Last edited:
visiondr
cyclic iconoclast
Agreed.
Edho, you are just taunting us...
:bang:
Edho, you are just taunting us...
tom_uk
Established
visiondr
cyclic iconoclast
Nice kit, Tom. How do you like the Summarit?
tom_uk
Established
Nice kit, Tom. How do you like the Summarit?
I have no problems with it, but there again I don't do low-light photography - if I did it wouldn't be fast enough. I do value its small size & comparative low weight. So I'm happy. Happy enough, in fact, that I'm contemplating getting a Summarit 35mm later this year, unless I can find a really good 35mm Summicron (non-ASPH, probably) for a good price.
I think the Summarits are very good lenses. I accept that in absolute terms they aren't as good (in various ways) as Summicrons or Summiluxes, but I don't do low light stuff, and I don't print at 30" x 20", so they're plenty good enough for me.
goldchen96
Member
back alley
IMAGES
I have no problems with it, but there again I don't do low-light photography - if I did it wouldn't be fast enough. I do value its small size & comparative low weight. So I'm happy. Happy enough, in fact, that I'm contemplating getting a Summarit 35mm later this year, unless I can find a really good 35mm Summicron (non-ASPH, probably) for a good price.
I think the Summarits are very good lenses. I accept that in absolute terms they aren't as good (in various ways) as Summicrons or Summiluxes, but I don't do low light stuff, and I don't print at 30" x 20", so they're plenty good enough for me.
2.5 or 2.8 is plenty fast enough for most situations.
suedgar
Member
MP on colorfilm
yeah, not digital!
what film did you use for this ?
martin-f5
Well-known
what film did you use for this ?
it's a labeled film from a local drugstore,
but I think it's a fuji 400 ASA negativ film
johannielscom
Snorting silver salts
Nokton 1.5
Nokton 1.5
Hi there,
any chance on uploading some wide-open shots made with that Nokton? I'm curious as to softness and vignetting (both preferred - up to some level)
Cheers, Johan
Nokton 1.5
here is another one.
Hi there,
any chance on uploading some wide-open shots made with that Nokton? I'm curious as to softness and vignetting (both preferred - up to some level)
Cheers, Johan
goldchen96
Member
hi CLE,
very nice lens. don`t find good frames for that at the moment. you can have a look here, though:http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=59998
and try flickr and the such. nice photos there.
all the best.
very nice lens. don`t find good frames for that at the moment. you can have a look here, though:http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=59998
and try flickr and the such. nice photos there.
all the best.
Last edited:
edho
edho
anoldsock
Established
Man, part of the reason why I love Leicas. Each camera has it's own unique history and soul. Not like today's DSLRs that fall to the wayside and get replaced every few years
sepiareverb
genius and moron
And who'd I hear scoffing about some baby taking up time???

visiondr
cyclic iconoclast
And who'd I hear scoffing about some baby taking up time???![]()
![]()
![]()
Nahh, nothing really to do with junior. The wife's dad invited us over for dinner. It'll be fun. But he's no Taj Mahal.
Harry S.
Well-known
Hi Ron
Ive only had the M3 for less than a week and I havent even shot 1 roll with it yet! I got it from David Murphy here on these forums.
Already I like it better than the M6. It is smoother, feels nicer to the touch and I believe its built better. The VF looks incredible for a standard lens.
Realistically I will use them equally. The M6 for 28mm and the M3 for 50mm. I have a Jupiter-8 on the M3 now but Im saving for a summicron.
Ill post some results if they come out decently.
Ive only had the M3 for less than a week and I havent even shot 1 roll with it yet! I got it from David Murphy here on these forums.
Already I like it better than the M6. It is smoother, feels nicer to the touch and I believe its built better. The VF looks incredible for a standard lens.
Realistically I will use them equally. The M6 for 28mm and the M3 for 50mm. I have a Jupiter-8 on the M3 now but Im saving for a summicron.
Ill post some results if they come out decently.
cole
Established
man that cv 35/1.4 looks compact. More and more i'm contemplating getting one of them.
It's very compact, and the images are fantastic, too. Some people find the bokeh problematic - I personally love it. It's almost surreal.
N
Nikon Bob
Guest
Never thought I would bite the bullet on another M body but resistance was futile I suppose.
Bob
Bob
Last edited by a moderator:
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.