jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
Thus far in the poll, it is 2/3 in favor of manual wind. A better majority than any recent US electionWhy not manual shutter cocking? Simple, effective, quiet. RF cameras are prized for their lenses and their quiet operation- why abandon half of this? Because an SLR is completely motor driven? When I test drove the M8 what was the first thing I thought of? How much quieter the camera would be if there was manual shutter cocking- and I was working in the woods- no people to sneak up on.
With one faction calling for the return of the rewind lever and another for autofocus, I'm sure the wastepaper baskets in Solms are filling up...
SteveM(PA)
Poser
You should be able to order it one way or the other. I decide when my shutter gets cocked. I can't imagine doing it (or it being done by itself) right after I shot the person next to me 
Pablito
coco frío
When the next digital RF comes out
uh huh....
gfspencer
gfspencer
I often forget to wind when I'm using my M6.I'm torn. I like the idea of the manual winder but after years of shooting digital I often miss shots on my film RF's because I forget to wind.
sepiareverb
genius and moron
I forget to zip my fly from time to time as well, we all forget things. Something that would make the camera quieter and less battery dependent would be great.
POINT OF VIEW
Established
Something different
Something different
In another M8 thread a member suggested a manual frame advance lever, that would energize a generator, that could eliminate the battery. That sounds way cool to me. The technology is about 15 years old. It can be found in battery - less digital locks.
Something different
In another M8 thread a member suggested a manual frame advance lever, that would energize a generator, that could eliminate the battery. That sounds way cool to me. The technology is about 15 years old. It can be found in battery - less digital locks.
Tuolumne
Veteran
I love my RD-1. I never forget to wind any camera. I vote for manual wind. It's just soooo satisfying.
/T
/T
macmx
Established
In another M8 thread a member suggested a manual frame advance lever, that would energize a generator, that could eliminate the battery. That sounds way cool to me. The technology is about 15 years old. It can be found in battery - less digital locks.
I doubt whether this is realistic. The amount of energy you can produce with the winder, is not nearly enough to run the display, processor etc. Also, you can not "eliminate the battery", you would merely ADD an electro magnet to charge the battery, which would take up even more space.
dazedgonebye
Veteran
I doubt whether this is realistic. The amount of energy you can produce with the winder, is not nearly enough to run the display, processor etc. Also, you can not "eliminate the battery", you would merely ADD an electro magnet to charge the battery, which would take up even more space.
Well see, you'd have to put a clutch on the thing so you could crank it without cocking the shutter. That way you could charge the batteries by winding repeatedly.
Heck, maybe you could just put a crank on it that looks like the attached.
:angel:
Attachments
I think I'd like the option of delaying the shutter cocking, if the noise would be intrusive at the time of releasing the shutter. Obviously, manual shutter cocking can be done at a time of one's choosing, but a motorized cocking could be delayed too if there were a mode for that.
ZlatkoBatistich
Established
Manual winding is the way to go. Manual winding makes the photographer think and hence the photographs better. A simple manual crank is too easy, however, and only encourages hasty photography. Make it so that it has to be attached before each frame and then detached after each frame. Sort of like starting a biplane from the 1920's -- you don't leave the crank on when in flight. The crank can be stored in the baseplate when not in use. 

tomasis
Well-known
I love my RD-1. I never forget to wind any camera. I vote for manual wind. It's just soooo satisfying.
/T
indeed, it is the way to go. What it does matter if it is not "modern". The whole RF thing is considered to be retro, old fashioned so let us put more "old things"
0bli0
still developing...
i love using my rd1 for the manual winding and how quiet it is. i love the picture quality (except for high iso) on my m8. i hide my screen with my Luigi case. i would love for 'the next rf' camera to have a manual winder.
yanidel
Well-known
Definitely automatic. As a former owner of an R-D1 before the M8, the one almost palpable burden that I was released from with the M8 was forgetting to wind on. I can't tell you the number of shots I missed because I had forgotten to wind on with the R-D1. If you are desperate for a manual wind get an R-D1 and fine camera that it is you'll soon find yourself yearning for a M8.
LouisB
I rewind straight after any shot when using the RD-1, like an automatism. It is now very seldom that I miss a shot because of forgetting to rewind. It does happen, but I miss more shots because of the power down than the rewind.
user237428934
User deletion pending
I like the way a Konica Hexar AF works in the silent mode. After taking a picture no film-advance is executed unless you release the trigger. In a quiet environment you can take the picture and you just hava to wait for some environment noise. Then you release the trigger and the film is advanced by the motor.
gfspencer
gfspencer
I think I like the idea of manual winding but then I remember when I shot Nikon film cameras I always put a motor drive on them . . . so maybe I didn't like manual winding all that much after all.
POINT OF VIEW
Established
Doable
Doable
The footprint for the Xo9 combination lock is 4in. x 1in. The generator is 2mm. The lock does not have any battery, that was a government requirement, for design. One extended crank would be more than enough to charge a 80 uf. capacitor, that is enough current to power a stun gun. A two crank lever would be enough current for all the M8 requirements. Removing the battery would leave a 4x5 mm. space. That is enough for a large generator + capacitor. This is doable. Bill
Doable
I doubt whether this is realistic. The amount of energy you can produce with the winder, is not nearly enough to run the display, processor etc. Also, you can not "eliminate the battery", you would merely ADD an electro magnet to charge the battery, which would take up even more space.
The footprint for the Xo9 combination lock is 4in. x 1in. The generator is 2mm. The lock does not have any battery, that was a government requirement, for design. One extended crank would be more than enough to charge a 80 uf. capacitor, that is enough current to power a stun gun. A two crank lever would be enough current for all the M8 requirements. Removing the battery would leave a 4x5 mm. space. That is enough for a large generator + capacitor. This is doable. Bill
Mattikk
Well-known
How about that when you release the trigger it cocks the shutter? This way you could just hold the button down for as long as you don't want that extra noise. In continous shooting mode this would of course be disabled. It doesn't save up the battery, but maybe it can be quieter.
I'm not sure on wheter to vote for auto or manual, but generally I feel that a rangefinder should have more mechanical and less electronic components.
I'm not sure on wheter to vote for auto or manual, but generally I feel that a rangefinder should have more mechanical and less electronic components.
Last edited:
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.