Spyderman
Well-known
My first RF camera was Canonet. At that time I had a Canon EOS SLR kit, so the Canonet was the perfect small camera to take everywhere. But then I felt I needed longer reach and bought a Zorki 4 and Jupiter-8 (50mm) and Jupiter-9 (85mm). The viewfinder was nothing to write home about, so I bought my first Bessa R. But my Jupiter-12 wouldn't fit, so I had to buy a CV 35/2.5. About a year later I replaced the R with an R2. The R2 has served me well for almost 2 years, and I still have it, but I still wanted a Leica.
About a month ago a fellow RFF member palec called me and asked if I could check the RF of his Leica. I've never handled a Leica before, but think I'm a good technician, so I agreed. From the first moment that I held his M6 I was caught. The RF turned out to be OK, but a week later palec offered me one of his Leicas - an M6 (another one). The price was very good (and I could actually hold it and test it before buying, which is priceless IMO), and I even had the money I got for graduation from university, so I bought it as my little present for successfully finishing the school.
Since then I had the chance to compare it with my Bessa R2. The bessa has brighter and wider field viewfinder (Leica's VF looks like tunnel compared to Bessa), but the sound of the shutter makes the biggest difference. On fast speeds (say from 1/125 up) they are about the same, but on slower speeds the Leica is so much quieter, making just a silent "thwap", whereas the Bessa makes "ckack-clack" (on slow speeds you can actually hear 2 times 2 curtains). The second biggest difference is the rangefinder patch. On Bessa I have to move my eye in the eyepiece to find the spot where I see the patch. It can disappear completely. On Leica there is no such problem, and I can focus immediately as I bring the camera to my eye. This greatly improves my speed of shooting.
The only negative thing I've noticed is that the 50mm frame is very small. Not just small, but it shows much less than the actual coverage of 50mm lens. Actually, all the frames show much less. I wonder if I could use the inside of 75 frame for 90mm lens at infinity...
In the past 5-6 weeks I've shot about 8-10 rolls of film. A lot more than in a few months before. The handling and the silent shutter makes me shoot more.
To sum it up - it took me 6 years from nothing to Leica M. I bought my first serious camera (Canon EOS SLR) when i finished high school, during the university evolved into a RF fan and after I graduated I bought a Leica. I hope that I'll be able to give it to my child one day...
PS: two weeks ago I got a bad GAS attack and bought new set of lenses for my new camera: Nokton 40/1.4 (I couldn't afford Nok 35), Canon 50/1.4 and Ultron 28/1.9. They all arrived last thursday, just one day before my 24th birthday 😛
PPS: And I got Koudelka's Invasion 68 for the birthday 😉
About a month ago a fellow RFF member palec called me and asked if I could check the RF of his Leica. I've never handled a Leica before, but think I'm a good technician, so I agreed. From the first moment that I held his M6 I was caught. The RF turned out to be OK, but a week later palec offered me one of his Leicas - an M6 (another one). The price was very good (and I could actually hold it and test it before buying, which is priceless IMO), and I even had the money I got for graduation from university, so I bought it as my little present for successfully finishing the school.
Since then I had the chance to compare it with my Bessa R2. The bessa has brighter and wider field viewfinder (Leica's VF looks like tunnel compared to Bessa), but the sound of the shutter makes the biggest difference. On fast speeds (say from 1/125 up) they are about the same, but on slower speeds the Leica is so much quieter, making just a silent "thwap", whereas the Bessa makes "ckack-clack" (on slow speeds you can actually hear 2 times 2 curtains). The second biggest difference is the rangefinder patch. On Bessa I have to move my eye in the eyepiece to find the spot where I see the patch. It can disappear completely. On Leica there is no such problem, and I can focus immediately as I bring the camera to my eye. This greatly improves my speed of shooting.
The only negative thing I've noticed is that the 50mm frame is very small. Not just small, but it shows much less than the actual coverage of 50mm lens. Actually, all the frames show much less. I wonder if I could use the inside of 75 frame for 90mm lens at infinity...
In the past 5-6 weeks I've shot about 8-10 rolls of film. A lot more than in a few months before. The handling and the silent shutter makes me shoot more.
To sum it up - it took me 6 years from nothing to Leica M. I bought my first serious camera (Canon EOS SLR) when i finished high school, during the university evolved into a RF fan and after I graduated I bought a Leica. I hope that I'll be able to give it to my child one day...
PS: two weeks ago I got a bad GAS attack and bought new set of lenses for my new camera: Nokton 40/1.4 (I couldn't afford Nok 35), Canon 50/1.4 and Ultron 28/1.9. They all arrived last thursday, just one day before my 24th birthday 😛
PPS: And I got Koudelka's Invasion 68 for the birthday 😉