Smoooth.... how big of a magnification until you see the grain, Barrett?
This is full-frame. But, trust me, grain is crazy-
crazy tight.
As far as post-scan adjustments go: one adjustment layer for Levels, and that was it. No color adjustment whatsoever (scanning tip: if you're using VueScan, use the color setting for Kodak Portra 160VC). One big reason I love Portra is is that, for me at least (I'm using a Minolta DS 5400, but this has been the case with all my Minolta scanners, going back to my first QuickScan 35), the film is drop-dead easy to scan, requiring at most, elementary tweaks in PS. The new Ektar was engineered to use the same color channels as the Portra line, meaning that if, like me, you shoot and like Portra, adding this film to your roster won't have you throwing fits at the computer. This scan was made at 2700dpi; I'm going to do a full-res scan shortly and see how it prints. But, yes, this stuff is smooth.
Not "digital-smooth", thankfully (that title, IMO, belongs to something like Fuji Provia 400F...incredibly tight grain, but I never totally grokked the look of it); I was counting on Rochester not to screw this film up by trying to ape a digital-like patina, and thankfully they seem to have resisted. But I'll want to wring out this film a bit more before I make a decisive call (you might call this the exit-poll edition of my testing
😉). But, so far, I like what I see, a
lot.
- Barrett