Vivian Maier Shooting in Obscurity - negs discovered

[pesphoto]

A photographer in Chicago recently purchased the negatives of a
photographer from an estate sale and is posting them online. No one
ever heard of her until now. She had 1000 undeveloped rolls of film he
is going thru. This is worth following. He is posting her work here


http://vivianmaier.blogspot.com/

 

[pesphoto]

Here is the story straight from the chicago photographer that bought the negs.
http://www.flickr.com/groups/onthestreet/discuss/72157622552378986/

 

[Kevin]

First Chicago get Stochl, an now this !!

 

[Florian1234]

Wow, interesting. Thanks for giving that link.

 

[Ducky]

Quite a bit of the photos on the blog are NYC, not Chicago. I'd guess she either visited or lived there for a while.
She had a great eye and skill with that camera. Some very powerful stuff.

 

[bmattock]

Bookmarked. Thanks, it is very cool.

 

[JeffGreene]

Thanks, PESPHOTO, strong work! I was unable to make out the type of TLR from her picture. Just wondering. 🙂

 

[pesphoto]

im sure someone can tell us the make of the camera

 

[Al Kaplan]

I think that there's a lesson or two (or three) here for all of us. This woman accomplished this with a twin-lens reflex camera, probably a Rolleiflex. She used just one lens and managed to come up with great compositions with the square format. She wasn't afraid of her subjects, nor were they afraid of her. For the most part they were well aware that she was there.

Think about it next time you agonize over which camera(s) to take, which lenses, how are you ever going to get up the nerve to photograph strangers, OMG! what if they see you? She probably had more than on keeper on every 12 exposure roll too!

 

[ElectroWNED]

I think that there's a lesson or two (or three) here for all of us. This woman accomplished this with a twin-lens reflex camera, probably a Rolleiflex. She used just one lens and managed to come up with great compositions with the square format. She wasn't afraid of her subjects, nor were they afraid of her. For the most part they were well aware that she was there.

Think about it next time you agonize over which camera(s) to take, which lenses, how are you ever going to get up the nerve to photograph strangers, OMG! what if they see you? She probably had more than on keeper on every 12 exposure roll too!

well said....

 

[Al Kaplan]

Thanks (as I thread another roll of cheap Arista EDU 400 in the Rolleiflex T)

 

[LeicaFoReVer]

Great stuff...It is sad though she was not recognized before her death 🙁

 

[easyrider]

Rolleiflex

Rolleiflex

im sure someone can tell us the make of the camera

It's a Rolleiflex for sure. Looks like one of the last models with the smaller focussing knob. MX Type 1 or Type 2. Made up to 1954.

She had a great eye for the square negative.

Thanks for posting.

 

[easyrider]

I think that there's a lesson or two (or three) here for all of us. This woman accomplished this with a twin-lens reflex camera, probably a Rolleiflex. She used just one lens and managed to come up with great compositions with the square format. She wasn't afraid of her subjects, nor were they afraid of her. For the most part they were well aware that she was there.

Think about it next time you agonize over which camera(s) to take, which lenses, how are you ever going to get up the nerve to photograph strangers, OMG! what if they see you? She probably had more than on keeper on every 12 exposure roll too!

Well put. I recall reading about Ruth Orkin. She asked a male photog for advice and he told her to get a TLR because a girl could not deal with a variety of lenses... she took that famous "American Girl in Italy" shot of a bunch of guys ogling a girl walking down a Rome street.

http://images.google.ca/images?hl=en&source=hp&q=ruth+orkin+american+girl+in+italy&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=aY_TSpLnFZPAlAfOwcmFAw&sa=X&oi=image_result_group&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CBkQsAQwAA

 

[dazedgonebye]

I'm just amazed.

 

[sepiareverb]

Beautiful work. I'm quite taken by the similarity of subject matter and vision between her work and some of the early Friedlander work of the early 60's.

 

[dexdog]

wow, impressive, and this a genre that I don't especially care for.

 

[peter_n]

Tremendous! Thanks for posting this.

 

[retnull]

Amazing work -- she was obviously someone who thought a lot about what she was doing.

 

[Jarle Aasland]

Thanks for sharing.

Jarle