pesphoto
Veteran
A photographer in Chicago recently purchased the negatives of a
photographer from an estate sale and is posting them online. No one
ever heard of her until now. She had 1000 undeveloped rolls of film he
is going thru. This is worth following. He is posting her work here
http://vivianmaier.blogspot.com/
photographer from an estate sale and is posting them online. No one
ever heard of her until now. She had 1000 undeveloped rolls of film he
is going thru. This is worth following. He is posting her work here
http://vivianmaier.blogspot.com/
Last edited:
pesphoto
Veteran
Here is the story straight from the chicago photographer that bought the negs.
http://www.flickr.com/groups/onthestreet/discuss/72157622552378986/
http://www.flickr.com/groups/onthestreet/discuss/72157622552378986/
Kevin
Rainbow Bridge
First Chicago get Stochl, an now this !!
Florian1234
it's just hide and seek
Wow, interesting. Thanks for giving that link.
Ducky
Well-known
Quite a bit of the photos on the blog are NYC, not Chicago. I'd guess she either visited or lived there for a while.
She had a great eye and skill with that camera. Some very powerful stuff.
She had a great eye and skill with that camera. Some very powerful stuff.
bmattock
Veteran
Bookmarked. Thanks, it is very cool.
JeffGreene
(@)^(@)
Thanks, PESPHOTO, strong work! I was unable to make out the type of TLR from her picture. Just wondering. 
pesphoto
Veteran
im sure someone can tell us the make of the camera
Al Kaplan
Veteran
I think that there's a lesson or two (or three) here for all of us. This woman accomplished this with a twin-lens reflex camera, probably a Rolleiflex. She used just one lens and managed to come up with great compositions with the square format. She wasn't afraid of her subjects, nor were they afraid of her. For the most part they were well aware that she was there.
Think about it next time you agonize over which camera(s) to take, which lenses, how are you ever going to get up the nerve to photograph strangers, OMG! what if they see you? She probably had more than on keeper on every 12 exposure roll too!
Think about it next time you agonize over which camera(s) to take, which lenses, how are you ever going to get up the nerve to photograph strangers, OMG! what if they see you? She probably had more than on keeper on every 12 exposure roll too!
ElectroWNED
Well-known
I think that there's a lesson or two (or three) here for all of us. This woman accomplished this with a twin-lens reflex camera, probably a Rolleiflex. She used just one lens and managed to come up with great compositions with the square format. She wasn't afraid of her subjects, nor were they afraid of her. For the most part they were well aware that she was there.
Think about it next time you agonize over which camera(s) to take, which lenses, how are you ever going to get up the nerve to photograph strangers, OMG! what if they see you? She probably had more than on keeper on every 12 exposure roll too!
well said....
Al Kaplan
Veteran
Thanks (as I thread another roll of cheap Arista EDU 400 in the Rolleiflex T)
LeicaFoReVer
Addicted to Rangefinders
Great stuff...It is sad though she was not recognized before her death 
easyrider
Photo addict
Rolleiflex
Rolleiflex
It's a Rolleiflex for sure. Looks like one of the last models with the smaller focussing knob. MX Type 1 or Type 2. Made up to 1954.
She had a great eye for the square negative.
Thanks for posting.
Rolleiflex
im sure someone can tell us the make of the camera
It's a Rolleiflex for sure. Looks like one of the last models with the smaller focussing knob. MX Type 1 or Type 2. Made up to 1954.
She had a great eye for the square negative.
Thanks for posting.
easyrider
Photo addict
I think that there's a lesson or two (or three) here for all of us. This woman accomplished this with a twin-lens reflex camera, probably a Rolleiflex. She used just one lens and managed to come up with great compositions with the square format. She wasn't afraid of her subjects, nor were they afraid of her. For the most part they were well aware that she was there.
Think about it next time you agonize over which camera(s) to take, which lenses, how are you ever going to get up the nerve to photograph strangers, OMG! what if they see you? She probably had more than on keeper on every 12 exposure roll too!
Well put. I recall reading about Ruth Orkin. She asked a male photog for advice and he told her to get a TLR because a girl could not deal with a variety of lenses... she took that famous "American Girl in Italy" shot of a bunch of guys ogling a girl walking down a Rome street.
http://images.google.ca/images?hl=en&source=hp&q=ruth+orkin+american+girl+in+italy&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=aY_TSpLnFZPAlAfOwcmFAw&sa=X&oi=image_result_group&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CBkQsAQwAA
dazedgonebye
Veteran
I'm just amazed.
sepiareverb
genius and moron
Beautiful work. I'm quite taken by the similarity of subject matter and vision between her work and some of the early Friedlander work of the early 60's.
dexdog
Veteran
wow, impressive, and this a genre that I don't especially care for.
peter_n
Veteran
Tremendous! Thanks for posting this.
retnull
Well-known
Amazing work -- she was obviously someone who thought a lot about what she was doing.
Jarle Aasland
Nikon SP/S2, Fuji X100
Thanks for sharing.
Jarle
Jarle
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.