payasam
a.k.a. Mukul Dube
I have so far resisted the temptation of posting, on this site, photos not taken with rangefinder cameras. This one was to have been put in a thread where I said that while selective focus was possible with Four Thirds cameras and lenses, it was difficult and was not such as to satisfy anyone used to 35mm full frame. However, in view of a consideration serious enough to be called a physiological threat to photographers, I decided to start a new thread.
Thirty months ago I got my first zoom lens (on a 4/3 camera). I had no earlier experience of zoom lenses, although since the mid 1970s I had used Canon SLRs for which those lenses were to be had.
With 50 and 35 and 100 and 28 and 135 lenses (Canon SLR and Leica/Canon RFDR), I zoomed with my feet and managed well enough. Getting closer to the subject or farther away became actions that did not require thought.
Now, having done a great deal of work with a zoom lens, where the photographer need not move as distance is determined optically and needs no more than a supple wrist, I find that I do not zoom with my feet any more when using lenses of fixed focal length. My feet might just as well not be there.
I am worried. Do feet which have fallen into disuse become vestigial, like the muscles with which only a few humans can still wag their ears, or do they suffer atrophy and eventually turn green and fall off?
Thirty months ago I got my first zoom lens (on a 4/3 camera). I had no earlier experience of zoom lenses, although since the mid 1970s I had used Canon SLRs for which those lenses were to be had.
With 50 and 35 and 100 and 28 and 135 lenses (Canon SLR and Leica/Canon RFDR), I zoomed with my feet and managed well enough. Getting closer to the subject or farther away became actions that did not require thought.
Now, having done a great deal of work with a zoom lens, where the photographer need not move as distance is determined optically and needs no more than a supple wrist, I find that I do not zoom with my feet any more when using lenses of fixed focal length. My feet might just as well not be there.
I am worried. Do feet which have fallen into disuse become vestigial, like the muscles with which only a few humans can still wag their ears, or do they suffer atrophy and eventually turn green and fall off?