Asim
Well-known
This is a hypothetical question. I don't have the funds to purchase a collector's Leica! But just for fun....
what is THE ONE Leica body that you would like to have sitting on your mantelpiece.
what is THE ONE Leica body that you would like to have sitting on your mantelpiece.
taskoni
Well-known
The actual Nikon F3 that was on the moon
Nokton48
Veteran
Plaubel Pecoflex in the original box.
Erik van Straten
Veteran
1. An original black paint MP with a low number (1956).
2. An original black paint IIIg.
3. An original black paint IIIf including a black paint Elmar 50mm f/3.5.
Erik.
2. An original black paint IIIg.
3. An original black paint IIIf including a black paint Elmar 50mm f/3.5.
Erik.
Vickko
Veteran
Hmmm. How about:
Che Guevara's Nikon S2 with 50mm f1.1 internal mount
Leica IIIg Swedish Triple Crowns
Leica KE-7A
Black Nikon F with eye level prism
Leica M3D from David Duncan
Che Guevara's Nikon S2 with 50mm f1.1 internal mount
Leica IIIg Swedish Triple Crowns
Leica KE-7A
Black Nikon F with eye level prism
Leica M3D from David Duncan
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
1/ Che's Nikon S3 and the internal mount 50f1.1 (on display in Havana). ThomasW already has first dibs on Korda's M2.
2/ Hypothetically: Oscar Barnack's Ur-Leica.
2/ Hypothetically: Oscar Barnack's Ur-Leica.
Clancycoop
Established
I'll take Robert Frank's Leica IIIC that he took around the country with him to shoot "The Americans". Anyone know if this camera is actually in a collection somewhere?
I actually have no desire to collect "important" cameras, strangely. Collecting cameras for me to use is another story.
I actually have no desire to collect "important" cameras, strangely. Collecting cameras for me to use is another story.
johannielscom
Snorting silver salts
.
Jim Marshalls black paint M4 with Leicavit and Summilux 35/1.4.
The single most all-seeing camera in the history of Rock 'n' Roll for sure.
.
Jim Marshalls black paint M4 with Leicavit and Summilux 35/1.4.
The single most all-seeing camera in the history of Rock 'n' Roll for sure.
.
Having Che's Nikon would be like having something used by Hitler. No thanks.
I'm with Johan on this...Marshall.
I'm with Johan on this...Marshall.
Clancycoop
Established
Having Che's Nikon would be like having something used by Hitler. No thanks.![]()
No, it would be like owning something owned by Che Guevara.
The moment someone compares something to Hitler that is not Hitler, I stop respecting their opinion because it is such a lazy comparison. I'm sure you are a thoughtful individual so maybe you might want to rethink speaking in such absolutist terms as it might cause people who would otherwise listen to you to tune out.
gdi
Veteran
1/ Che's Nikon S3 and the internal mount 50f1.1 (on display in Havana).
Be sure not to wash the blood off, the value might drop...
I was comparing collecting something of Che's to collecting something of Hitler's. I choose neither. If someone thinks less of me because of that, so be it. 
rolleistef
Well-known
the Che had an S3 with a 1.1 lens? That's not exactly a proletarian's camera!
Henri Cartier Bresson's Leica Standard
Henri Cartier Bresson's Leica Standard
Vickko
Veteran
Did Che shoot with an S3 as well? The famous photo I know has him with an S2.
Vick
Vick
1/ Che's Nikon S3 and the internal mount 50f1.1 (on display in Havana).
jody36
Well-known
any leica who wants to give me one?
Juan Valdenebro
Truth is beauty
Having Che's Nikon would be like having something used by Hitler. No thanks.![]()
I wouldn't have any problem about owning things that belonged to Hitler.
People kill for different reasons...
I would have killed Hitler.
I would have never killed Che.
I'd love to use any object that belonged to Che, especially a camera!
End of my politics talk.
Cheers,
Juan
Corto
Well-known
Larry Fink's Mamiya 6
Nugard
Elvis lives!..
Thanks, I'm ok with mine... If I use it well, in time, you will want my camera...
nobbylon
Veteran
Jim Marshall M4
Garry Winogrand M4
Any original MP as Eric said
A Hasselblad from the moon
Garry Winogrand M4
Any original MP as Eric said
A Hasselblad from the moon
mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
Oh, come on. This is so easy: you need to pay an enormous amount of money for my 1956 DS M3 - after all (check the serial number) it is unique! No other M3, AFAIK, was made with that number. You can then have a "unique" Leica, and I can have an M9 and probably enough left over to buy an M3 (again, because I wouldn't be without one).
OK. The deal doesn't sound so good from your end. But from my end it looks fine.
Do you think we can do business?
...Mike
OK. The deal doesn't sound so good from your end. But from my end it looks fine.
...Mike
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.