yanchep_mike
Always Trying
In the Mail. I bought an Agfa Silette Rapid, my first real camera in 1967, just nostalgia on my behalf.
Dogman
Veteran
Speaking of nostalgia, I'm waiting for the last piece to complete the set of lenses I owned originally used when I first became obsessed with photography. Over the last couple of years I put together these lenses one by on--the 35/2.8 Nikkor-S, the 50/1.4 Nikkor-S and the 85/1.8 Nikkor-H. Now I have ordered the 24/2.8 Nikkor-N C. to complete the quartet. Those were my original lenses.
I've bought several old Nikkor lenses of various focal lengths over the last few years, most of them being fine but some being dogs. Seemed hard to find the specific ones I wanted that weren't beat up badly. I'm hoping this 24mm is in good shape to replace the one I bought before it, affectionately called "Squeaky".
I've bought several old Nikkor lenses of various focal lengths over the last few years, most of them being fine but some being dogs. Seemed hard to find the specific ones I wanted that weren't beat up badly. I'm hoping this 24mm is in good shape to replace the one I bought before it, affectionately called "Squeaky".
Retro-Grouch
Veteran
You will love this lens!
shawn
Veteran
Nice lens! I had that on a black MX and it was a potent little combo. Shouldn't have sold that pairing.
Looking forward to trying it! It was at a local shop for nearly nothing. They listed it as 'well used' but other than a tiny bit of paint loss on the focus ring, it's perfect. I'll put it on an ME Super.
p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
girdwoodINC
born under a bad sign
santino
FSU gear head
MJU 1?
p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
Yeap 😊MJU 1?
Michael Markey
Veteran
Wow a Mju ... had a few over the years.
At one stage they were going for over two hundred.
At one stage they were going for over two hundred.
KoNickon
Nick Merritt
Classic stuff. Black/blue.
I don't know if you have watched the video below but not bad for a £10 watch.
I just put another battery in my W-71 (which I think predates the F-91W) -- I got it in 1985 for maybe $15. I'm starting to wonder when the calendar will run out, and just what will happen then. Multiple strap replacements along the way; still a great watch.
Tuna
Fotoğrafçı
Did you buy it outright or are you paying the installments?
sojournerphoto
Veteran
They still are in some places.Wow a Mju ... had a few over the years.
At one stage they were going for over two hundred.
Have an old one to my youngest daughter and a LUMIX LX5 - also trendy as it’s got a ccd sensor!
p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
Personally, I prefer the aesthetics of the Casios that came before the F91w, like yours. 👌I just put another battery in my W-71 (which I think predates the F-91W) -- I got it in 1985 for maybe $15. I'm starting to wonder when the calendar will run out, and just what will happen then. Multiple strap replacements along the way; still a great watch.
jesse1dog
Light Catcher
Bought a non-working Braun Paxette 1 (1953 vintage) complete with case for £6.50 on eBay
Seller stated that the shutter didn't fire - and it still doesn't.
I really wanted its' Kata 45mm f2.8 lens (with aperture blades that would only open to f4!)
Unscrewing the lens the aperture wouldn't budge.
It took real brute force to get any movement. You would cringe to read what I had to do with a mole wrench! But with persistent working back and forth, a drop of alcohol, and a drop of something stronger, the blades are now very easy up to f16, an aperture I'm unlikely to use.
I've now to be realistic. I've no use for the body so it's best sent to 'scrap metal' and then the rather classy leather case to 'land-fill'.
I can't see any realistic alternatives - can you?
All a bit of a shame but the world has changed in the last 70 years.
Seller stated that the shutter didn't fire - and it still doesn't.
I really wanted its' Kata 45mm f2.8 lens (with aperture blades that would only open to f4!)
Unscrewing the lens the aperture wouldn't budge.
It took real brute force to get any movement. You would cringe to read what I had to do with a mole wrench! But with persistent working back and forth, a drop of alcohol, and a drop of something stronger, the blades are now very easy up to f16, an aperture I'm unlikely to use.
I've now to be realistic. I've no use for the body so it's best sent to 'scrap metal' and then the rather classy leather case to 'land-fill'.
I can't see any realistic alternatives - can you?
All a bit of a shame but the world has changed in the last 70 years.
KoNickon
Nick Merritt
So this is the non-rangefinder model with (inconvenient) extinction meter? I got one here a few years ago -- the holiday giveaway. Cute camera and well made, though not of great specification (e.g. the Staeble-Kata). But I didn't get a case, so don't go pitching it just yet!Bought a non-working Braun Paxette 1 (1953 vintage) complete with case for £6.50 on eBay
Seller stated that the shutter didn't fire - and it still doesn't.
I really wanted its' Kata 45mm f2.8 lens (with aperture blades that would only open to f4!)
Unscrewing the lens the aperture wouldn't budge.
It took real brute force to get any movement. You would cringe to read what I had to do with a mole wrench! But with persistent working back and forth, a drop of alcohol, and a drop of something stronger, the blades are now very easy up to f16, an aperture I'm unlikely to use.
I've now to be realistic. I've no use for the body so it's best sent to 'scrap metal' and then the rather classy leather case to 'land-fill'.
I can't see any realistic alternatives - can you?
All a bit of a shame but the world has changed in the last 70 years.
AntonioC
Established
sojournerphoto
Veteran
A Ricoh GV-2 finder for the GR iii. Used from the auction site a lower price than most are asking.
I’ve got other 28mm finders, but this very small and optically quite good. It’s small enough to be unobtrusive and, importantly, to be used when useful. It doesn’t demand to be used - the GR iii is the only camera where I am comfortable using the screen for shooting - but is there when it’s the better choice.
It’s smaller than it looks in this picture, as is the camera.

I’ve got other 28mm finders, but this very small and optically quite good. It’s small enough to be unobtrusive and, importantly, to be used when useful. It doesn’t demand to be used - the GR iii is the only camera where I am comfortable using the screen for shooting - but is there when it’s the better choice.
It’s smaller than it looks in this picture, as is the camera.

Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.