chuckroast
Well-known
China couldn't remotely do this. They are a dangerous paper tiger, deeply in debt, with a tremendous decline in population.I'll bet China would be willing to take over those responsibilities 😆
China couldn't remotely do this. They are a dangerous paper tiger, deeply in debt, with a tremendous decline in population.I'll bet China would be willing to take over those responsibilities 😆
Trading nations are wise to have a fleet to protect trade routes. This is prudent. The smaller nations do benefit, true. The alternative is not acceptable. So the smaller nations will continue to benefit. However, if you can keep trade routes open and the seas safe for trade without a navy I am eager to know how.
The US won't much longer - our current yards are incapable of continuing to build modern ships acceptably (look up Ward Carrol on youtube) and the economics of it interfere with massive tax cuts to the .001% class. Modernization programs are being cut left and right because of that for ground, air and naval forces. Even some of the best older gear (the A-10) is being forcibly retired to save money for tax cuts and to fund ICE. NASA just took another massive hit as well and that will severely impact the military.But "trading nations" do not, only the US does, and that was my point. The US taxpayer is paying a hidden tariff to support this sevice for all trading nations.
The world's other Navies are incapable of projecting the ongoing global presence to do this widely.
Agreed. What does change is who, and how, they are responded to.Whether the Barbary pirates in the early 1800s or the Houthis 200+ years later, some things never change.
The US won't much longer - our current yards are incapable of continuing to build modern ships acceptably (look up Ward Carrol on youtube) and the economics of it interfere with massive tax cuts to the .001% class. Modernization programs are being cut left and right because of that for ground, air and naval forces. Even some of the best older gear (the A-10) is being forcibly retired to save money for tax cuts and to fund ICE. NASA just took another massive hit as well and that will severely impact the military.
The Chinese are currently in an economic slump but they will recover because they are the only ones in a position to pick up the pieces being left on the table by the US and Russian Federation governments; all they have to do is wait.
The US won't much longer - our current yards are incapable of continuing to build modern ships acceptably (look up Ward Carrol on youtube) and the economics of it interfere with massive tax cuts to the .001% class. Modernization programs are being cut left and right because of that for ground, air and naval forces. Even some of the best older gear (the A-10) is being forcibly retired to save money for tax cuts and to fund ICE. NASA just took another massive hit as well and that will severely impact the military.
The Chinese are currently in an economic slump but they will recover because they are the only ones in a position to pick up the pieces being left on the table by the US and Russian Federation governments; all they have to do is wait.
Read the book above for a nonpartisan understanding of global trade.I don’t think we should be rosy eyed about the reasons the US has chosen to project its power on the global stage - it hasn’t been for philanthropic reasons or to help the little guy. Successive administrations have understood the benefits that could be had for them both in terms of their domestic interests and the way in which it has extended US political and economic influence. America’s problem now is that they have an administration that knows the cost of everything but the value of nothing.
To answer that last question would take this conversation to places that the mods really don't want it to go.
As for Peter Zeihan, he's just the latest catastrophist. Empires come and go but trade always remains. Even after the Late Bronze Age collapse of 1177 BCE trade didn't go away. America is going away as an empire as did the UK after WWII, for many of the same reasons. I believe that it will be the Chinese that will pick up the pieces and be even less benevolent than the iron fist of the US was.
It's a good time for moving to Europe for an educated American.