b.espahbod
Optophile
Can you please tell me should I go for the Monster Distagon 15 2.8 or the tiny VC 15?
noimmunity
scratch my niche
This is a tough question or an easy one, depending on what parameters you set. What do you need it for? How much do you use 15? What kind of resources do you have? What other lenses do you have/want?
Check out Ken Rockwell's review of the CV Heliar.
Fuwen on this site had the ZM briefly and posted some shots on his blog.
I'd buy the CV, save up or redistribute as the case may be, and get one of the new Leica summiluxes (21/1.4 or 24/1.4) if it were me.
Check out Ken Rockwell's review of the CV Heliar.
Fuwen on this site had the ZM briefly and posted some shots on his blog.
I'd buy the CV, save up or redistribute as the case may be, and get one of the new Leica summiluxes (21/1.4 or 24/1.4) if it were me.
b.espahbod
Optophile
I need 21mm perspective (90deg diagonal) on M8 preferably with less distortion as possible, i couldn't find any relative distortion charts for VC 15mm or even an mtf.
__hh
Well-known
Here's one person's opinion on one of the lens
http://www.stevehuffphotos.com/Steve_Huff_Photos/VOIGTLANDER_15_HELIAR_REVIEW.html
http://www.stevehuffphotos.com/Steve_Huff_Photos/VOIGTLANDER_15_HELIAR_REVIEW.html
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Well, I've used both, and the Tri-Elmar too.
Personally I'd back the Tri-Elmar but can't afford it. If I needed the speed, and didn't already have the Voigtländer, the Zeiss might be in the running. But it's huge and expensive, and the Voigtländer is tiny and cheap, and I don't use 15(20) much, so the 24/1.4 is a higher priority when it comes to fast wides.
Tashi delek,
R.
Personally I'd back the Tri-Elmar but can't afford it. If I needed the speed, and didn't already have the Voigtländer, the Zeiss might be in the running. But it's huge and expensive, and the Voigtländer is tiny and cheap, and I don't use 15(20) much, so the 24/1.4 is a higher priority when it comes to fast wides.
Tashi delek,
R.
Spoks
Well-known
Here's one person's opinion on one of the lens
http://www.stevehuffphotos.com/Steve_Huff_Photos/VOIGTLANDER_15_HELIAR_REVIEW.html
Thanks for the link,
Here was a lot of valuable stuff. As advice on how to cope: 'Living in the cheap in this fragile economy'. Might come handy. In this perspective, the VC 15 is just perfect.
bluegt2
Newbie
The Distagon is a superb lens. I have used mine on my R-D1 and M8. Other than the 28/2 ASPH, I find the Distagon to superior in every way to Leica w/a lenses. The new Super Elmar is rangefinder coupled and less money, but the Distagon focuses much closer and is brilliant at f/4. If you want max performance, I would buy the Distagon. If you want usefulness and better resale, buy the Super Elmar.
b.espahbod
Optophile
Is distagon coupled?
gchao
Member
Is distagon coupled?
No, Distagon is not rangefinder coupled.
johannielscom
Snorting silver salts
I'm still in the loop for a wide angle, I sold nearly all Nikon gear last month to fully get into RF but am hanging on to an F100 with Sigma 17-35EX for the time being,
Then the Heliar will be my weapon of choice, thanks to the review from the link!
Then the Heliar will be my weapon of choice, thanks to the review from the link!
back alley
IMAGES
i have settled on zeiss for all my lenses but i doubt that my budget will ever allow for the zm 15, so the new cv 15 will likely be my choice for the rd1, unless i get a great deal on the ltm version.
joe
joe
b.espahbod
Optophile
did anyone have both or tried both ???
Last edited:
Dante_Stella
Rex canum cattorumque
The CV is a great lens!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.