Sonnar2
Well-known
Don't make me feel ashamed, just a bit envious of getting old.. ;-)
There are some amazing young photographers out there.
A couple that come to mind:
Ann He - 15 years old.
Nirrimi Hakanson - 17 years old.
Are you kidding? They are not amazing young photographers, just cute chicks with cameras that show some skin on flickr.
It's one thing to look at another photographer's work and state "they are really good". When they are this young, they should be encouraged to keep up the good work.
another to announce that they put you to shame. If that is tha case, you need to evaluate the work that you are doing, and if you are in a rut. You become your own worst critic, which means the only person really unhappy with your work is "you".
As far as announcing that these teenagers have no talent- jealosy of them being so young and being this good.
I'm also a bit puzzled about the 'obvious Photoshop tricks' comments made by several. If they succeed as pictures (or as captioned pictures), what of it? To me, the quality of the photography stands out a good deal more than the post-processing. Clearly I'm looking at the wrong things!
Cheers,
R.
Honestly, I've become bored very quickly with every single one of the links provided so far...
Nirrimi / Diesel Clothing / New York ...still found the work unimpressive
I hate to sound like an ass, but...
Not bad, but not great. A bunch of head and shoulders portraits with canned-looking photoshop actions. As patrickjames said, standard looking flickr fair. Though, certainly a cut above the P&S party shots. He's got a decent eye and if he sticks with it, might be really good.
I do tire of all the PS actions for different looks. It really annoys me when people use 5 different looks from what is clearly the same shoot. B&W, check. 'Vintage' colors, check. Cross processed, check...
I will say this though: 16 yr old with a 5DII? WTF mate?
I recognize this style as commonly used in ads targeted to youth. Around globe companies roll out campaigns to look like they know youth, like they care for them. But they don't.
Companies care for income, for money youth (and their parents) are going to spend for casual wear which suddenly costs like it's imported from outer space. What companies care for is to turn youth thinking that wearing certain wear is trendy, that they become cooler and smarter that way. This is true perversion not when elder man sits by the kids' playground with camera over shoulder.