charjohncarter
Veteran
John, I'm surprised, but other than that how do you think the results are. They look good to me especially with a flat day. Here is the thread on Apug, read posts 2 and 12 also look at the thumbnail;
http://www.apug.org/forums/forum37/55796-tmx-rodinal-examples.html
http://www.apug.org/forums/forum37/55796-tmx-rodinal-examples.html
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
Yes, overall I think they make a winning combination! I probably didn't mix the dev enough...
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
charjohncarter
Veteran
Gabriel, great, couldn't be better. Of course, a great model helps, too.
John, did you look at that APUG thread? I use a plastic reel and tank some people say they encourage uneven development. And I have had it a couple of times with Rodinal, but never when I used 4 minutes between cycles; good luck
John, did you look at that APUG thread? I use a plastic reel and tank some people say they encourage uneven development. And I have had it a couple of times with Rodinal, but never when I used 4 minutes between cycles; good luck
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
Gabriel, great, couldn't be better. Of course, a great model helps, too.
John, did you look at that APUG thread? I use a plastic reel and tank some people say they encourage uneven development. And I have had it a couple of times with Rodinal, but never when I used 4 minutes between cycles; good luck
Yes, I read it...I just switched to metal reels actually. Rodinal 1:50 has always been perfect for me agitating every minute in terms of evenness (though highlights sometimes burned a bit), but when I tried 1:100 stand recently, I got heavily burned edges, and now this afternoon I got somewhat burned edges. Just one edge, presumably the bottom. And I was actually letting it go for only 3 minutes between agitations!
However, it could be that I let the temperature get up to 70 or 71 degrees...anyway, Rodinal usually works fine for me and I'm sure it will continue to do so.
snausages
Well-known
CharJohn, thank you for those details. I can't seem to find Rodinal in NY, but I'll look into getting some shipped. John, without my 'model' I'd be taking a lot more pictures of cameras sitting on desks! I shot a couple frames with the Elmar this weekend - they're in the scanning queue now...
charjohncarter
Veteran
CharJohn, thank you for those details. I can't seem to find Rodinal in NY, but I'll look into getting some shipped. John, without my 'model' I'd be taking a lot more pictures of cameras sitting on desks! I shot a couple frames with the Elmar this weekend - they're in the scanning queue now...
Amen brother, luckily I have three granddaughters, they are the only ones that will act like models for me. And how better to use a 90mm Elmar.
snausages
Well-known
John, 3 granddaughters sounds great - triple the Elmar possibilities.
Continuing to love everything this lens does...
Continuing to love everything this lens does...


Last edited:
anjoca76
Well-known
I picked up a pretty nice 90/4 Elmar about a year ago from someone here on RFF, after buying my first screw mount Leica, but unfortunately I haven't used it much--mainly because I didn't have an external viewfinder for it. Plus, 90mm has always been a tough focal length for me to wrap my brain around anyway. But lately I have been interested in shooting more portraits, and this thread has motivated me to finally get myself a viewfinder, which I did last week. My VIOOH should be waiting for me on my doorstep when I get home!
Last summer, for the fun of it I took some shots with the Elmar despite not having the viewfinder for it, knowing full well that guessing at 90mm frame lines on a iiic without a viewfinder is next to impossible (well, for me, at least). Suffice to say, my results were quite comical!
I'll post some samples once I get the VIOOH.
Last summer, for the fun of it I took some shots with the Elmar despite not having the viewfinder for it, knowing full well that guessing at 90mm frame lines on a iiic without a viewfinder is next to impossible (well, for me, at least). Suffice to say, my results were quite comical!
I'll post some samples once I get the VIOOH.
batterytypehah!
Lord of the Dings
The VIOOH at 90 is not very comfortable for me but it works. Just remember the parallax setting. Or rather, make sure to leave it at infinity and train yourself to aim slightly high. For me, that works better than fiddling with one more setting for every shot.
anjoca76
Well-known
The VIOOH at 90 is not very comfortable for me but it works. Just remember the parallax setting. Or rather, make sure to leave it at infinity and train yourself to aim slightly high. For me, that works better than fiddling with one more setting for every shot.
Thanks for the tip! Good to know. I admit I'm not expecting a whole lot from the VIOOH other than to at least be able to get some use out of the 90/4. I also am fortunate to have pretty good eyesight and don't wear glasses, which I imagine would complicate matters tenfold.
Filzkoeter
stray animal
maddoc
... likes film again.
Nice thread !




Mr_Flibble
In Tabulas Argenteas Refero
Wolluk-Stock 2011, with Leica IIIa and 90mm f/4 Elmar (1937 - coated), yellow filter and FIKUS hood. Film Ilford XP2 super



anjoca76
Well-known
I love these samples! Very inspiring uses of the 90/4 elmar!
batterytypehah!
Lord of the Dings
Thanks for the tip! Good to know. I admit I'm not expecting a whole lot from the VIOOH other than to at least be able to get some use out of the 90/4. I also am fortunate to have pretty good eyesight and don't wear glasses, which I imagine would complicate matters tenfold.
I do (wear glasses, that is) but that's not much of a problem, except at the full 35mm view. It's the "tunnel vision" at the longer FL settings that gets tiresome after a while. For the price though, there's nothing wrong with it. (Full disclosure, mine is not the Leitz original but a Walz branded Japanese copy that was $20 if memory serves.)
Mr_Flibble
In Tabulas Argenteas Refero
I prefer the VIDOM myself; I find the image a little clearer because of one less prism, but you get the left/right inversion.
Then again, my VIOOH was classed UGLY at KEH.
The 90mm view through them isn't too bad. It's the absolutely tiny 135mm and too wide 35mm view that are the worst.
Then again, my VIOOH was classed UGLY at KEH.
The 90mm view through them isn't too bad. It's the absolutely tiny 135mm and too wide 35mm view that are the worst.
ktran
Established
One of my first ever shots with my 1953 copy (on sensia, with my IIIc):

the droghte of Marche hath perced to the roote by khoa_sus2, on Flickr
I just imagined the 90mm framelines inside of my built-in 50mm finder (I use a RASAL now)
The Elmar is also quite useful on my digital PEN:

entre nous by khoa_sus2, on Flickr

2011-04-08 Orion Belt and Sword by khoa_sus2, on Flickr

the droghte of Marche hath perced to the roote by khoa_sus2, on Flickr
I just imagined the 90mm framelines inside of my built-in 50mm finder (I use a RASAL now)
The Elmar is also quite useful on my digital PEN:

entre nous by khoa_sus2, on Flickr

2011-04-08 Orion Belt and Sword by khoa_sus2, on Flickr
simonankor
Registered Addict

From a slightly hazy 1935 black one.
lxmike
M2 fan.
GAS attack..................
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.