35mm f1.7 Ultron or 35mm f1.4?

That is a very nice shot, Maggie. I especially like the smoothness of the out of focus areas. I only got my Ultron quite recently, and was shooting 400 speed film, and so had little chance to explore its wide open performance, but it looks like I have some good news coming.

Cheers,
Dez

I've got loads of M8 shots, if that helps.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mediawench/sets/72157608072327949/

This one was shot wide open:


Blossom, April 30, 2011 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr
 
I used to have an Ultron, however the barrel became loose so I sent it to Cosina for repairs. Within one week the barrel was loose again, so I gave up on the lens. However, I thought the rendering was superb and would still be using it if I could.
 
The 35mm Ultron f/1.7 that you are considering has a documented history of problems with the build: check it out. The Nokton, by contrast, is both compact and very well made: it feels solid.

Just developed my first two rolls shot with the 35/1.4 Nokton. I am a bit surprised at how contrasty it is (single coat); it's plenty sharp and has its own "signature" that's for sure. I think it renders textures well.

10890363766

photostream

photostream

photostream

photostream

photostream

photostream
 
I agree with you Traveler, contrast is not flat at all, I would call it about "medium", but what I like is that the Nokton manages to retain shadow detail well, at least in my experience.
 
I used to have an Ultron, however the barrel became loose so I sent it to Cosina for repairs. Within one week the barrel was loose again, so I gave up on the lens. However, I thought the rendering was superb and would still be using it if I could.

Same thing happened to mine. However, instead of sending it to Cosina, I Googled the repair. Turns out it was a two hour job, and I had to buy a 000 Phillips head. A dab of enamel paint on the loose screws fixed it permanently.
 
Back
Top Bottom