johnastovall
Light Hunter - RIP 2010
How's the 50/1.5 Aspherical Nokton on the M8? Sean's review looks good and I'm want a 50 to shoot until I get my old LTM 50/2.0 'Cron back from Sherry with the IIIG.
Also do I really need to worry about coding on 50's and over if I'm using a cut filter?
Also do I really need to worry about coding on 50's and over if I'm using a cut filter?
Gid
Well-known
http://strachan.zenfolio.com/p115942526/
The link is to a set of images I took with the 50 Nokton on the M8 - these were taken without an IR cut filter.
You don't need to code 50mm lenses IMO and experience.
The link is to a set of images I took with the 50 Nokton on the M8 - these were taken without an IR cut filter.
You don't need to code 50mm lenses IMO and experience.
kbg32
neo-romanticist
It's a wonderful lens on the M8. I usually hate 50s, but this one is a great performer. Wonderful contrast, sharpness, and bokeh.
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
I'm not impressed with the build quality of the lens, but I seem to be the exception in that field. My speciman is not holding up too well.
But It does take good pictures...
But It does take good pictures...

cmogi10
Bodhisattva
johnastovall
Light Hunter - RIP 2010
Your images are locked. We can't see them.
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
Is that better?
ferider
Veteran
cmogi10 said:I'm not impressed with the build quality of the lens, but I seem to be the exception in that field. My speciman is not holding up too well.
Carl,
some 40 and 50 Noktons do start to wobble after a while. Some 35
Ultrons, too. Fixable, though, with screw driver and nail polish. See here,
for instance:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=32396
Other negatives:
- the lens is too big for an effective 50/1.6;
- min. focus is too long.
An older Canon 50/1.4 has similar signature, is better built and half stop faster and half the size.
Roland.
Last edited:
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
Ah! Thanks for that, I'm afraid to use it in fear of it completely falling apart but I'l give it a shot.
johnastovall
Light Hunter - RIP 2010
cmogi10 said:Is that better?
Yes, very nice......
KEH
Well-known
Bought it for the F1.5 on my M8 and haven't regretted it.
Cheers,
Kirk

Cheers,
Kirk
johnastovall
Light Hunter - RIP 2010
I'm seen and read enough to now have one on order from Cameraquest.... 
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Yes, but the new Sonnar is EVEN NICER. I have both, and an M8.johnastovall said:I'm seen and read enough to now have one on order from Cameraquest....![]()
Cheers,
Roger (www.rogerandfrances.com)
wintoid
Back to film
Welcome back, Roger!
I like the Sonnar too, Roger; and it's good to see you here again!
cme4brain
Established
cmogi10 said:I'm not impressed with the build quality of the lens, but I seem to be the exception in that field. My speciman is not holding up too well.
But It does take good pictures...
Every Voigtlander lens I own seems to be of fantastic build quality. I am sorry the samples may vary, but I have had great luck!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.