back alley
IMAGES
would it/i be crazy to sell one of the zeiss ikons and buy a used rd1?
that is likely the only way i could afford one.
i don't mind digital especially since i would still be shooting film along side it.
i do like the idea of being closer to a final image without the need for processing and scanning time.
i am nowhere doing this without some long thought first.
whatcathink?
that is likely the only way i could afford one.
i don't mind digital especially since i would still be shooting film along side it.
i do like the idea of being closer to a final image without the need for processing and scanning time.
i am nowhere doing this without some long thought first.
whatcathink?
nikola
Well-known
you put it right: CRAZY! 
R
RML
Guest
Great idea, Joe! I mean it. Go for it. I hear the refurbs are back in Epson town again as well.
back alley
IMAGES
talk about polarity...
Never heard of the RD 1 as a lemon before.
I don't know if I would do it, but a lemon?
I don't know if I would do it, but a lemon?
Steve Litt
Well-known
Go for it- get one from someone reliable and enjoy Instant Karma( or is it Instant Kamera?) with the rest of us nuts!
Regards
Steve
Regards
Steve
Xmas
Veteran
Joe
You have only two problems
i) An M8 would be nicer
ii) rule 2 (from your signature)
'concentrate on improving my photos more and my kit less'
Suggest you PM admin and big 'smile'.
Noel
You have only two problems
i) An M8 would be nicer
ii) rule 2 (from your signature)
'concentrate on improving my photos more and my kit less'
Suggest you PM admin and big 'smile'.
Noel
FrankS
Registered User
Well, the M8 is too expensive for me, and I think that a better digi rangefinder camera than the RD1 will be coming along eventually.
That's the thing with computer technology including digital cameras, you never have to rush into buying, as improvements and or lower prices are never far away.
That's the thing with computer technology including digital cameras, you never have to rush into buying, as improvements and or lower prices are never far away.
back alley
IMAGES
Xmas said:
damn! caught...
Xmas
Veteran
Joe
Was not trying to be snide, I think I need resolutions in my sig.
People are having troubles with RD1 and ZIs, but Admin may have a better perspective, and your lenses will still work, and I'd suggest another to do
'enjoy more'
Noel
Was not trying to be snide, I think I need resolutions in my sig.
People are having troubles with RD1 and ZIs, but Admin may have a better perspective, and your lenses will still work, and I'd suggest another to do
'enjoy more'
Noel
back alley
IMAGES
i didn't think you were being snide noel, no worries.
every now and then i just feel antsy and want to shake things up a bit.
like selling the 50/2 and buying the 50/1.5...
every now and then i just feel antsy and want to shake things up a bit.
like selling the 50/2 and buying the 50/1.5...
Xmas
Veteran
Joe
Going digital is a big step, Gorge may not be looking back or thinking about OM1s.
Noel
Going digital is a big step, Gorge may not be looking back or thinking about OM1s.
Noel
zuikologist
.........................
Joe, if you really need digital, get a DSLR. Cheap(ish), hassle free(ish). You can even use those lovely OM lenses.
bmicklea
RF Newbie
Joe,
I'm not sure what you're using to scan but I just picked up a Nikon Coolscan V ED and am loving it. It scans quickly and handles all the film I shoot (except D3200) well. The scans I'm getting from my 100 ISO films (B&W and colour) are much better in my opinion than what my friends gets from his Digital Rebel XTi.
It's a bit of a hassle to scan, but not too much. If you're scanning your own stuff now and are looking to get rid of that step in the workflow then ignore me!
I'm not sure what you're using to scan but I just picked up a Nikon Coolscan V ED and am loving it. It scans quickly and handles all the film I shoot (except D3200) well. The scans I'm getting from my 100 ISO films (B&W and colour) are much better in my opinion than what my friends gets from his Digital Rebel XTi.
It's a bit of a hassle to scan, but not too much. If you're scanning your own stuff now and are looking to get rid of that step in the workflow then ignore me!
back alley
IMAGES
have you ever had what you thought was a really good idea...until you said it out loud and realized just how dumb it really was?
that's what i do here...i think i have a good idea and then i write it out in a post and listen to your responses.
works for me most of the time.
thanks.
joe
that's what i do here...i think i have a good idea and then i write it out in a post and listen to your responses.
works for me most of the time.
thanks.
joe
Turtle
Veteran
back alley said:
Confine yourself to a sanitorium. Heathen.
No WAY!
Tom
kbg32
neo-romanticist
Joe, with the right adapter, you can use your OM lenses on a RD-1.
http://www.cameraquest.com/adaptslrRFM.htm
http://www.cameraquest.com/adaptslrRFM.htm
back alley
IMAGES
kbg32 said:
holy crap keith, it's 350 bucks!!
of course, it means i could use the om lenses on the zeiss also.:bang:
kbg32
neo-romanticist
Sorry Joe. Just trying to burn out the GAS!
dreamsandart
Well-known
Well Joe, I can only speak from experience and I did the R-D1 thing a short time ago after all the M8 talk got me thinking of a 'digital-M', and am having a really great time with it, and this from someone as you know has a rather big investment in Leica rangefinder gear.
Part of that advantage is that I finally have a digital body at a reasonable price ( new for $1,700 ) to use my M-mount lenses on - fun, fun, fun.
The camera is everything I could hope for. I like the way it works and except for a slight out vertical alinement that I adjusted easily in a few minutes myself its been perfect.
I still have my Leicas for film which I'll always have and love to use, and medium format gear, but it sure is nice to just make images that are easy to review and share, quick to print and put on computer, shooting in RAW have color and B&W along with any ISO I need at the finger tips ( literally because the R-D1 is very analog in control use ).
If you want that digital option I think the R-D1 is a great way to do it, its not an M8 but for what I use it for it will pay for itself in film savings in a short time and the start-up cost is reasonable.
Part of that advantage is that I finally have a digital body at a reasonable price ( new for $1,700 ) to use my M-mount lenses on - fun, fun, fun.
The camera is everything I could hope for. I like the way it works and except for a slight out vertical alinement that I adjusted easily in a few minutes myself its been perfect.
I still have my Leicas for film which I'll always have and love to use, and medium format gear, but it sure is nice to just make images that are easy to review and share, quick to print and put on computer, shooting in RAW have color and B&W along with any ISO I need at the finger tips ( literally because the R-D1 is very analog in control use ).
If you want that digital option I think the R-D1 is a great way to do it, its not an M8 but for what I use it for it will pay for itself in film savings in a short time and the start-up cost is reasonable.