Well, a couple of things...
First, let's be honest, we're talking tools not people (but see last point below)...
🙂
Second, what if what you're doing with cameras changes? If I switch from doing landscapes to sports, should I keep trying to do sports on a 4x5?
😱
Third, what about engineering/technology developments? I'm among the worst examples, because I'm very happy with 1972 or even 1952 hardware, but things do move on. Should I insist on using 1952 emulsions and 1952 chemistry? Go back to glass plates, or the true camera obscura?
😉
Fourth, what if you don't get it right the first time? What if you find you really can't use a VF camera but an SLR really suits you?
Change is at least OK, sometimes admirable.
Now, I do want you to know that one of my M bodies is a 1954 M3...the first "real" camera I bought myself, purchased used, and pretty beat up, in 1971, and I still have it with me. That's a longer period than I've been married...
😉
thomasw_ said:
I don't see it that way. I see it as analogous to a marriage; the best ones are where the couple stays through the trials, the agitation and excruciating daily monotony and, if through good fortune and fortitude, they might even create some wonderful and beautiful images [i.e., kids] in their fecundity together. Same thing as between a guy and his faithful, old and familiar camera companion.
What of a hot and sexy new mistress or camera model? Oh, that's just GAS... If you can't grow old with it, it is just GAS 🙂