Juan Valdenebro
Truth is beauty
Little by little and without planning it, my considerations on which B&W film ISO to choose, have changed radically...
When I was a boy, it was “400”, because that was what an unknown store seller said was good for everything...
Years later, when I was a student and knew more about photography, it was 100 when there was direct sun, 400 for less light, and 3200 for even less light... And lower ISO for less grain...
Here's how it is for me now:
Today I went out with six cameras. The two smallest ones were in my pockets. An Oly XA for direct sun with ISO400 prefocused for f/8, and an Oly Wide100 for shadows with ISO3200 so the camera has to use a fast shutter speed and a small aperture...
The other four cameras were a manual SLR and a RF for direct sun, and two RF's for shadows: the SLR for direct sun with ISO400 at 1/500 f/11, and the sun RF with a 1.4 lens and ISO100 with ND8 for shooting at 1.4 only... The first shadows RF, with the 28 3.5 and ISO3200 for f/11, and the second shadows RF with ISO400 for selective focus and fast speeds at f/1.4.
This way I don't have to change lenses, and I can have, immediately, narrow or huge depth of field both under direct sun or in soft light... All the time I had 2 cameras hanging (one from each shoulder) depending on if I was under the sun or in the shadows, and the other two cameras in a small bag, and the smallest ones inside my pockets... It was comfortable, and so very fast...
So it looks like finally, some time ago, the main thing I think of when I decide ISO, is depth of field...
Anyone doing it in similar ways, or any comment?
Cheers,
Juan
When I was a boy, it was “400”, because that was what an unknown store seller said was good for everything...
Years later, when I was a student and knew more about photography, it was 100 when there was direct sun, 400 for less light, and 3200 for even less light... And lower ISO for less grain...
Here's how it is for me now:
Today I went out with six cameras. The two smallest ones were in my pockets. An Oly XA for direct sun with ISO400 prefocused for f/8, and an Oly Wide100 for shadows with ISO3200 so the camera has to use a fast shutter speed and a small aperture...
The other four cameras were a manual SLR and a RF for direct sun, and two RF's for shadows: the SLR for direct sun with ISO400 at 1/500 f/11, and the sun RF with a 1.4 lens and ISO100 with ND8 for shooting at 1.4 only... The first shadows RF, with the 28 3.5 and ISO3200 for f/11, and the second shadows RF with ISO400 for selective focus and fast speeds at f/1.4.
This way I don't have to change lenses, and I can have, immediately, narrow or huge depth of field both under direct sun or in soft light... All the time I had 2 cameras hanging (one from each shoulder) depending on if I was under the sun or in the shadows, and the other two cameras in a small bag, and the smallest ones inside my pockets... It was comfortable, and so very fast...
So it looks like finally, some time ago, the main thing I think of when I decide ISO, is depth of field...
Anyone doing it in similar ways, or any comment?
Cheers,
Juan