scottgee1
RF renegade
Hi all;
My understanding is (was?) that any SM to M adapter would work with the Bessa R bodies because all the adapter did was connect them to the camera and the user has to manually change the active VF frame. Contrasted to the Leica M bodies that require that the adapter trigger the correct frame.
I bought a Canon 35/1.8 for my newly acquired R2. I also bought what was supposed to be a 'universal' SM to M adapter ring. The adapter attaches correctly to the lens and bayonets to the body, but the mark on the lens indicating correct focus point as against the rotating focus ring is at about 10:30 (when looking at it from the front of the camera) AND when focused, it indicates a distance that is farther than my other two VC lenses. Oddly enough, if the focus point indicator was aligned at 12:00, it would match the other lenses.
So. Have I disproved the 'any adapter will work' theory? Or do I just have a bad adapter? 😕
TIA!/ScottGee1
My understanding is (was?) that any SM to M adapter would work with the Bessa R bodies because all the adapter did was connect them to the camera and the user has to manually change the active VF frame. Contrasted to the Leica M bodies that require that the adapter trigger the correct frame.
I bought a Canon 35/1.8 for my newly acquired R2. I also bought what was supposed to be a 'universal' SM to M adapter ring. The adapter attaches correctly to the lens and bayonets to the body, but the mark on the lens indicating correct focus point as against the rotating focus ring is at about 10:30 (when looking at it from the front of the camera) AND when focused, it indicates a distance that is farther than my other two VC lenses. Oddly enough, if the focus point indicator was aligned at 12:00, it would match the other lenses.
So. Have I disproved the 'any adapter will work' theory? Or do I just have a bad adapter? 😕
TIA!/ScottGee1