Advice on portrait lens

V0IGTLANDER

Member
Local time
12:17 AM
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
21
Location
Integrated Re$ort - $ingapore
I am new to RF, and am In the process of selecting lens for the Bessa R3A. For portrait, i am deciding between the following two lenses : 75/2.5 Color Heliar and the 50/1.5 Aspherical Nokton. Which one is a better choice wrt the visibility of the framelines .

Which sub-35 mm lens is most suitable for wide angle photography? Would like to hear from the experts here before place my order. Thanks.
 
Usually the longer focal length is more flattering for portraits, you might even consider the VC 90mm. 50mm will work in a pinch but if your buying a lens with portraits in mind I would look to a longer focal length.

Todd
 
Like Todd says, unless your doing low-light candids, in which the extra stops of the nokton would come in pretty handy.
 
The 50 Nokton is a great lens, but as Todd says, it's not really a portrait lens.

I have both the CV 75 and 90. Both great lenses for the money; the 90 might be my favorite CV lens. However, the 75 is a terrific performer and if I had to pick one, the shorter and faster 75 would be the pick. It would serve you well as a portrait lens.
 
Almost any lens can be a useful portrait lens; the more important issue is how far from your subject is the camera to be. Distance to the subject determines perspective. Different portrait subjects may be better at somewhat different distances. Most common for portraiture is the range of 4 to 7 feet or so, pleasant for most subjects. Conversational distance. Farther tends to flatten and widen faces; closer tends to emphasize pointy facial features, and ears disappear beyond the "horizon" of the head. People with wider flatter faces would benefit from a relatively close distance to increase the sense of roundness.

The second major issue is how much of the subject you wish to show; field of view, in other words. Say that you've picked 5 feet (1.5m) as your distance... if you want to include only the subject's head you'll need a 135mm lens. With 50mm, you'll get more, of course; a generously framed half-body length. Recently I've been almost exclusively using a 28mm for environmental portraits that include not just the person but his/her work environment such as desk+computer or milling machine, whatever, and getting in pretty close.

So, in a nutshell, I suggest you pick your distance according to the perspectinve you want of the subject, then pick your focal length on the basis of how much of your subject you want to include.
 
V0IGTLANDER said:
I am new to RF, and am In the process of selecting lens for the Bessa R3A. For portrait, i am deciding between the following two lenses : 75/2.5 Color Heliar and the 50/1.5 Aspherical Nokton. Which one is a better choice wrt the visibility of the framelines .

Which sub-35 mm lens is most suitable for wide angle photography? Would like to hear from the experts here before place my order. Thanks.

I own and use both lenses and recommend the 75 for portrait because you need a reduced DOF for that purpose. It's very sharp, you can get in troubles shooting ladies older than 30 with this lens ;-) 😉
 
Doug's comments pretty much sum it up. I have neither the 75 nor the 90 (I wish I had them both), but either would do a proper job as a portrait lens. The only lens suitable for portraits that I have at present is a 100/2.8 Super Takumar bolted to my beloved black-bodied Pentax Spotmatic. I also have the 135/2.5 Super Takumar. Both lenses work well in situations and distances described by Doug. Both are lenses no one in his right mind would ever sell.

However, I am building up a collection of RF lenses for my Bessa R, and my next acquisition wil be the 75. One lens at a time, says my wallet.

Ted
 
Back
Top Bottom