That level of optical distortion is wholly unacceptable for a $5,300, not-so-fast prime.
Jeez, now 1.4 is not fast either anymore?
That level of optical distortion is wholly unacceptable for a $5,300, not-so-fast prime.
Jeez, now 1.4 is not fast either anymore?
But! The lens isn't out yet!
Just like I predicted, slightly better than the Sigma, slightly worse than the Otus.
http://www.jupitersnake.com/review/50-summilux-sl-f1-4-review-first-look/
They may improve AF speed but I doubt the optics will be changed. Looks like it'll be another software correction dependant lens. I guess for the SL that doesn't really matter since you can't use it on film, but it doesn't really seem like you're getting what you pay for here.
As for the lenses, what photographer was dreaming up gigantic variable aperture zooms that cost double or triple a fixed 2.8 equivalent? And before you say they're best in class, does that really hold up if you have to stop down the new Nikon 70-200/2.8 to F4 at the long end?
However if Sony's next breakthrough sensor can handle light at offset angles...well...
Sure I am. But Leica invites this kind of treatment with sky-high pricing, obnoxious promotional materials where people open their boxes with white gloves on, and claims that they're the best. They have a rabbid user base online too that eats this stuff up. But there is always the kid in the story who laughs when the emperor has no clothes, and I'm happy to play that role. The 58/1.4 I mentioned was beat up in reviews up and down the internet but I'm comfortable defending it. It all evens out.
That level of optical distortion is wholly unacceptable for a $5,300, not-so-fast prime. It seems significantly more than the Noctilux. Draw is hard to say but IMO it doesn't best the APO-summicron. I would never take a kit of this size over the 7rII with the AF adapter and the APO Cron (which is actually what I use as a walkaround kit). Regardless of performance, that lens is just too freaking huge for a F1.4 50mm.
I also disagree that the APO Cron isn't meaningfully better than the ZM. I've owned, at one time or another, every modern-ish 50mm in Leica's lineup, and the APO delivers completely different output. It's just very, very good, and very noticeable even at online display sizes.
It might not be optically better that the Otus (yet to be verified) but the autofocus speed is infinitely better 😀 You have choices, "best" optically or most useful?
They might be variable aperture, but it's not an apples to apples comparison. The standard zoom goes to 90mm, not 70mm, and the tele goes from 90-280mm, not 70-20mm. So your two lenses now get you from 24-280mm, instead of 24-200mm. The question is now if that range is more useful to you than the fixed aperture? You make your decision and buy your camera, everything is not for everyone.
Surely Sony's issue is not their light handling on the sensor, but the horrible feeling of holding it? It has to be the worst ergonomically designed camera - although I've never used one of those sigma abominations...) 😱
Can't argue with the pricing and the naff gloves, but I suppose you need the gloves to charge the price 😀
EDIT: All this is from someone who doesn't own or plan to an SL, or any digital mirrorless or DSLR. I'm not defending the SL, it's just a camera.
I think at 50mm you're looking at a 3.2 aperture. There just isn't much about a 50mm 3.2 that I find exciting.
Idk man, looking at this comparison it just seems so close:
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2015/12/29/crazy-comparison-leica-50-apo-vs-the-zeiss-planar-zm/
Granted, RF ppl are nuts (talking about myself here) about the subtleties of 50mm lenses, so I can see picking one over the other, but it is crazy close. Certainly closer than you might imagine given the price of the APO. I wish he would have included the current Summicron M too.
I am an admitted Zeiss guy though. I have the block diagram of the 50mm Distagon tattoo'd on my arm haha.
...but I agree, the difference is completely disproportional to price. I don't think I would have bought one if I didn't get a great deal on a demo copy. And I can see why people would actually prefer the less technical draw. The APO 50 is for people who look at the Lux ASPH output and think "man, this would be more awesome if it were more clinical".
Saw the lens and camera combo real sweet! enjoy it Cal!
Godfrey,
I endear my 50 Lux-SL with the name "Porker." LOL.
Anyways I like the results and this camera is fun, fun and more fun.
Not built for comfort, but definitely built for speed.