Larky said:
oscroft just made me realise, I don't need to backup, I have the negs! 🙂
This does make me think about going 100% digital, or to put it another way, it does make me think about never going 100% digital.
And away we go. Sure, let's be smug. A little
schadenfreude, maybe? Pleasure in another's pain? You're a nice person. Not.
OK, let's trot it out again. Film are a single point of failure. Lose the original, you've lost it for good. No copy is as good as the original.
Houses burn down. They get swept away in floods, they have earthquakes and mudslides and you name it. Maybe not YOURS, but it happens somewhere, every day.
A copy of a digital photo is the same, bit for bit, as the original. Make copies and put them in more than one place, and you don't have a single point of failure anymore.
One method is better than the other. Always. And you know as well as I do which one that is.
When the World Trade Center was attacked, 40,000 irreplaceable negatives were lost, taken of the Kennedy years. They are gone forever. If they had been scanned and stored in multiple locations - like the financial data that was also destroyed that day - the world would still have them.
So yeah, film rocks, digital sucks. Got it. Moving on.