Anyone Happy With Their C/Y NEX Adapter

bwcolor

Veteran
Local time
7:50 AM
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
2,346
I tried a Fotodiox and it had lots of play on the lens side.

I'm open to any suggestions...

Pretty much given up on a smoothly functioning Contax G Adapter, but still hoping for a C/Y.
 
I've had a Novoflex adapter for C/Y lenses to my NEX 5 for several months now and could not be happier. Has worked without any really bothersome issues with every C/Y lens I own (5 or 6 including the early 60mm macro which I had heard could be a problem, and the 100-300 vario sonnar). Lens will focus slightly past infinity so one needs to be mindful of that. There is a very, very slight amount of play right to left once lens is attached, but nothing fore and aft and this has had no effect on image quality.
I've also got a Voigtlander adapter for my Nikon lenses and it has been all I could have asked for as well.
"You pay, you get" as my dad used to say.

Hope this helps.
 
It seems that Fotodiox quality control is all over the place. My copy had a lot of play and others none. I'm wondering if there is some form of adjustment that gets haphazardly adjusted at the factory. It is hard to believe that a machined part would have this much variance. If so, it should be adjustable by the end user.
 
I'm really happy with the results of my Novoflex adapter too; it is solid and allows me to use my C/Y glass, including the 60 mm macro, the 50 mm f1.4 and 135 mm lenses. There's a collar you can purchase to support longer heavy glass on a tripod. I don't have this - but might get it. Of course the Novoflex and Zeiss C/Y make a chunky carry round package - but it is worth it to use the glass.


Derek
 
Back
Top Bottom