edge100
Well-known
...I actually *really* like the output I'm seeing from my new M-E.

Testing out my new Leica M-E. by Michael Fraser Photography, on Flickr
Part of it might be the 50/1.2, but there's a 3D quality to this that I love. This is as close to film as I've ever seen from any digital camera. I wont be selling my MP or M2 any time soon, but now at least I know I can pick up a digital camera when it's called for, without sacrificing too much in terms of the subjective IQ that I prefer.

Testing out my new Leica M-E. by Michael Fraser Photography, on Flickr
Part of it might be the 50/1.2, but there's a 3D quality to this that I love. This is as close to film as I've ever seen from any digital camera. I wont be selling my MP or M2 any time soon, but now at least I know I can pick up a digital camera when it's called for, without sacrificing too much in terms of the subjective IQ that I prefer.
Last edited:
Vickko
Veteran
Nocti 50/1.2? Wow, you are in a very very exclusive club. Love the image isolation that you achieved.
edge100
Well-known
Nocti 50/1.2? Wow, you are in a very very exclusive club. Love the image isolation that you achieved.
Ha! No. Canon.
But it speaks volumes that you thought it might be the Noctilux.
Vickko
Veteran
A fantastic shot, you nailed the focus !
edge100
Well-known
A fantastic shot, you nailed the focus !
Thanks! It was especially tricky with a *very* mobile little subject.
airfrogusmc
Veteran
SWEEEET!!!!!
Sorry for the short shallow answer but if it fits?
I really like the M9, Have never shot with an M-E but would probably like it even better because of it's more stripped down operation.
Sorry for the short shallow answer but if it fits?
I really like the M9, Have never shot with an M-E but would probably like it even better because of it's more stripped down operation.
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
Nope, it might be just self illusion. Fuji seems to be more close, IMO.... This is as close to film as I've ever seen from any digital camera. ...
I saw it on Flickr today and it made me wonder right away, how come this DIY C-41 guy shots digital now.
But nice to know you made it! I use digital for family pictures a lot.
Range-rover
Veteran
No that's a great shot, and don't feel bad about using digital. There are those
special moment that do come out great (Like the shot above) that digital is
perfect for and with that right lens it all comes together.
Range
special moment that do come out great (Like the shot above) that digital is
perfect for and with that right lens it all comes together.
Range
edge100
Well-known
Nope, it might be just self illusion. Fuji seems to be more close, IMO.
But nice to know you made it!
Note the pronoun in my original post.
I shot the X-Pro1 for ~3 years. This is MUCH closer to what I want from a digital file. Not objectively better or worse; just subjectively better, to me.
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
Note the pronoun in my original post.
I shot the X-Pro1 for ~3 years. This is MUCH closer to what I want from a digital file. Not objectively better or worse; just subjectively better, to me.
Sorry, I don't know what "pronoun" means, ESL...
edge100
Well-known
Sorry, I don't know what "pronoun" means, ESL...![]()
"I"
As in, "This is as close to film as **I**'ve ever seen from any digital camera."
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
So it is "IMO"? Same as mine. 
edge100
Well-known
So it is "IMO"? Same as mine.![]()
Precisely.
The difference is, I never told you that your opinion was "self illusion".
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
I see... have you seen I use "might"?
airfrogusmc
Veteran
Edge if I still had a darkroom i would still be shooting film in some capacity but a kinda forced downsizing and clients have pushed me to digital. No regrets and i don't want my digital files to look like film. If I wanted a film look I would shoot film. My MM files look like med format files only I have more control than I ever had with film and I'm an old zone system guy. The M-E is a wonderful camera. I am probably going to switch to all Leica M in the next few years and I might pick up an M-E for backup.
Godfrey
somewhat colored
edge100,...I actually *really* like the output I'm seeing from my new M-E.
Testing out my new Leica M-E. by Michael Fraser Photography, on Flickr
Part of it might be the 50/1.2, but there's a 3D quality to this that I love. This is as close to film as I've ever seen from any digital camera. I wont be selling my MP or M2 any time soon, but now at least I know I can pick up a digital camera when it's called for, without sacrificing too much in terms of the subjective IQ that I prefer.
Charming photo! And it sounds like you're happy with the M-E's imaging qualities.
That's great, and it's all that matters. Congrats on the M-E, use it well and enjoy it.
G
MCTuomey
Veteran
Great shot, nice light. Congrats on the camera, and glad you find the imaging to your liking. As I understand it, the CFA for the M9's sensor was engineered to emulate kodachrome, so yeah it's meant to render in a filmic way. Fwiw, I find the same is true of files from my fuji xt1 - different film type of course - but same response to my eyes.
Richard G
Veteran
Nice. I love my M9. Interesting comment about Fuji. The first images I saw from the X100 looked very film like to me, and I've often found it so in use, especially the X100 jpegs where it is quite difficult to blow the highlights, just like C-41 film.
Archiver
Veteran
Very nice. The M-E / M9 produces files with a fantastic look, and very difficult to replicate or even approximate with another camera. The closest I've found are the Ricoh GXR-M, and weirdly, the Sigma DP1 and DP2, despite their quirky colour palettes.
gb hill
Veteran
I think the subject agrees with you...very cute!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.