Calzone
Gear Whore #1
- Local time
- 12:14 AM
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 16,873
- Location
- The Gateway To The Hudson Highlands
Cal, I'm amazed you got that letter so fast !
I really think you should get a subscription to "Four Wheeler". They are always fixing up something and print a list of suppliers at the end of each article. Might save you time in running down suppliers.
A question for you: Is Nippon Camera good with Nikon F2 ? My black F2 needs to be looked at-there is a wire loose or shorted some place. It won't work with a meter and I've checked the terminals that supply power to the meters and I have no voltage there. I'd like to get this thing up and working fully.
MFM
MFM,
It seems that Nikon F2’s are their specialty. I have had many a F2 serviced there when I had a F2 fetish. They also gave me a breakdown about the continued improvements and subtle differences that happened over the years or the decade that the F2 was produced.
I had F2’s that had slotted screws. It seems the later F2’s had a better shutter brake and are likely the best. In a ways kinda like how the later Leica M3’s are most coveted. Anyways I happen to love my old early dual stroke with a glass backing plate and back door retainer.
Did you know that Nippon is the Factory Authorized service center for Linhof? I had a Baby Tech IV overhauled there that I bought for no money. I bought this camera for no money with the 100/2.8 Zeus’s Planar. It also came loaded with accessories.
The seller was very clear that the 100/2.8 had some lens separation. I sent it to John at Focal Point to have it repaired, but was explained that if in the boiling process to separate the failing Balsom the lens could shatter, and if it did I still would owe John the full fee of the repair. So pretty much this was a gamble or similar to winning the lottery.
In a Calzone manner I won’t the lottery with the 100/2.8. I think it cost $250.00 or $175.00 to repair the lens separation.
Soon after I got the Planar repaired John at Focal Point retired. I was likely one of his last clients, and I came in just under the wire. How lucky was that? “Divine intervention,” I say.
The Baby Tech IV was in minty condition, but the rangefinder was off. The back had a small dent from an impact that was EZ-PZ to use a vise to flatten to the extent that I only know that the camera was damaged. I ended up paying about $700.00 to have the Linhof overhauled.
Devil Christian says that this camera and my Baby Tech V are like museum pieces. The Baby Tech V is highly unusual and a prototype with no serial number. It has a cam cut for only a Rodenstock 95/2.8, the camera lacks movements to the extent that it is basically a very compact lightweight folding camera.
I have GAS for a Rodenstock 95/2.8. At this point it is a rare lens. Passed an opportunity on a used scratched one, but ask Devil Christian, I’m kinda fussy.
Somehow I managed to buy a Zeiss 53/4.5 wide. I managed to find a cam, so I was able to retain the original cam in OEM form. Of course the camera will not fold, but the cam for the 53mm Zeiss highly likely is also cut for the Zeiss 100/2.8 planar.
The Baby Tech V is a true “Monster” with the 53/4.5. Small camera for a Linhof, but a huge and heavy lens. My idea was to have a normal/wide kit so I could shoot Linhofs like I shoot Leicas. About a 15 pound kit. Now that I have the C10 perhaps that shot of the 8x10 with the truck becomes within the realm of possibilities.
I would have to cut the corners on the lens board of the 100/2.8 to fit the Planar to the Tech V. This would be great because the Prototype would be lighter and smaller than any Linhof I know except for Devil Christian’s Linhof 220 that has mucho you suck factor.
Devil Christian basically bought the Linhof 220 for no money and got it to back in operation. The rangefinder was broken and then he fixed the film advance.
At this point the 95/2.8 Rodenstock might never happen, but the Planar on the Tech V is mucho attractive as a small medium format camera.
BTW Nippon is not cheap. It was and is a Pro shop.
Cal