gho
Well-known
"How do your negatives look like? Are they very dark? If yes, looks like heavy overexposure or overdevelopment."
Yes, very dark.
"Can you scan two frames, so that the space inbetween is completly black?"
Yes, here:
Thanks, I had a look at your photos in a photo editing software. The full histogram is there, but it is looking heavily compressed. In my scanning software the preview looks like this, if there are too many black areas in the preview frame and it automatically tries to "adjust" for it. Getting the crop right fixes this. But as you say, it is probably the development, as the negs also seem to be a bit uneven. Setting the blackpoint and whitepoint while scanning and tweaking the mids should help to get something usable out of it, but it will still be grainy. This is not necessarily a bad thing.
Is the area between the frames also exposed on the negatives?
Chris, don't get discouraged. What I would do next is to expose a test roll with a standard scene, bracket [@100, @200, @400, @800, @1600] and develop it according to the instructions or the massive development chart. Be gentle with your agitations/inversions. What is the name of your developer?
If you do not want to use toxic chemicals, this site may also be interesting. Coffee works as a developer, it is possible to get all the ingredients in the supermarket. I started my bw developing with that some years ago and am playing with the thought of returning, as Reinhold seems to have optimized the formulas with extensive testing. There are also stand development recipies, that claim, that you could use different film speeds on the same roll. Probably more fun and less toxic.
However, once you have decided for one developer/film combo, I would try to get that down first, before switching to early.
Last edited: