Paul T.
Veteran
To reply to the OP, there is no such thing as a single best camera: only the best camera for a given application and for a given photographer.
Cheers,
R.
Well, Kirsty will certainly never have you on Desert Island Discs, Roger!
To reply to the OP, there is no such thing as a single best camera: only the best camera for a given application and for a given photographer.
Cheers,
R.
Not really -- and I've been using 'em almost 40 years, on three continents, travelling by motorcycle, Land Rover, Jeep, train, bus, air, foot...so I have some idea of what I'm talking about. Never banged a rangefinder out of alignment, either.
R.
Konica Hexar AF
My M3 is by far the smoothest I have ever owned.
I had an F100 for a while and thought it couldn't be better... until I picked up an F5.
When I hear "best" with no qualifications, I think of the relevant camera that does it's job (to take pictures) most effectively - a workhorse, basically. To that end, the F6 and EOS 1V came too late in the game, so it would have to be the Nikon F5 - long production life, very effective journalistic camera.
Of course if you are a camera manufacturer, your definition is probably centered around number of sales or profit, in which case maybe it would be something like the Canon AE-1? 🙄