hellomikmik
Well-known
keep what you have for low light and add to it c-bio 35/2,8 zeiss. you have mentioned two cameras anyway.
The CV 35/2.5 is OK in central frame and gets better as you focus closer, but for infinity landscapes I found the lens unusable on either A7 or R, because of the edges.
the 1.4 is much better, I found.
I have a Nokton 35mm f/1.4 MC right now and for the most part I'm very happy with it but I would like a sharp and distortion free RF 35mm as I find it the ideal focal length for travel.
Here's what I would like:
-small, light, compact
-f/1.4 or f/2
-ideally sharp wide open
-inexpensive (around $1000)
-will work on both A7 and M6
some of the lenses I have in mind
-35mm Summicron IV (150% my budget but I've always wanted one for the M6 and A7)
-ZM Biogon 35mm f/2
-Canon 35mm f/2 LTM
I wouldn't mind going with 40mm Summicron-C either or even Nokton 40mm 1.4 if they are great
As much as we want to venerate magnificent film-based lenses, they simply don't shine in the digital domain. The flatness of the sensor and it's desire for perpendicular light rays demands 'tele-centric' designs.
thanks for the suggestions, how does the summicron ASPH perform on the A7?
my concern with the Biogon and Summicron is that from what I've read, they don't perform as great as on a RF camera with smearing in the corners but then it might just be the internet over-exaggerating things.
I would love to get a Summicron IV, one of my dream lens for the M6 and A7 but would like to see more examples of it on the A7.
Might stop by the Camera Store one of these days and play with the 35 biogon and summicron.
here's the softness of the CV 35 1.4 at 1.4
DSC01813 by earl.dieta, on Flickr
which I don't really mind since my 1.4 shots are only for small prints.
but a little disheartening seeing the distortions, even at f/8 or f/11
Bora Bora colors by earl.dieta, on Flickr