TXForester
Well-known
I don't have anything in MF, so I'd take any Fuji RF, Mamiya 6 or 7, Pentax 67, or one of several TLRs.
Just for grins, a Crown Graphic or Speed Graphic, or maybe a large format field graphic.
In digital, any of the newer full frame cameras from Canon (I have some Canon lenses) if for no other reason than the good high ISO can come in handy.
Just for grins, a Crown Graphic or Speed Graphic, or maybe a large format field graphic.
In digital, any of the newer full frame cameras from Canon (I have some Canon lenses) if for no other reason than the good high ISO can come in handy.
Roger Hicks
Veteran
The f/3.5 is nicer. I've tried both, and given that the Rollei is not a camera I'd choose for action photography, I could live with 2/3 stop slower.
Hasselblads are great with standard lenses but poorly balanced with everything else. Again, yes, I've tried 'em.
Cheers,
R.
useless generation
Established
-Rolleiflex with the 2.8 Plannar
-Mamiya 7II
-Contax T
-Toyo 45AII
-Mamiya 7II
-Contax T
-Toyo 45AII
siracusa
Well-known
I guess if there were three cameras I'd really like they would be:
1. Konica III because it intrigues me and some of the Konica images posted by an RFFer here have impressed me
2. Agfa Super Solinette because it looks cool and I'm shallow like that
3. Either a Bronica ETRS or a Mamiya 645 because I need to shoot more MF and my Rolleiflex Automat is lovely, but not the sharpest at f3.5
I haven't bought any of these so far (though I came close to getting a Konica III) because to me cameras are just things that make images, and I figure I can only use one camera at a time.
1. Konica III because it intrigues me and some of the Konica images posted by an RFFer here have impressed me
2. Agfa Super Solinette because it looks cool and I'm shallow like that
3. Either a Bronica ETRS or a Mamiya 645 because I need to shoot more MF and my Rolleiflex Automat is lovely, but not the sharpest at f3.5
I haven't bought any of these so far (though I came close to getting a Konica III) because to me cameras are just things that make images, and I figure I can only use one camera at a time.
Vics
Veteran
I think I have all I could want.
aeturnum
Established
As a general disclaimer, nothing on this list would improve my photography one iota, but it would be fun to have:
Rollei 6008AF w/ PQS 50mm 2.8
Sigma SD1
Sigma DP2M
Quality 4x5 view camera
Bessa III
Leica M
Rollei 6008AF w/ PQS 50mm 2.8
Sigma SD1
Sigma DP2M
Quality 4x5 view camera
Bessa III
Leica M
nikon_sam
Shooter of Film...
I've said once before and I'll say it again...the Nikon F3 HP with an MD-4 attached...
An Olympus Pen-F...
Pentax 67 with the WLF...
I'll add more when I think of them...
An Olympus Pen-F...
Pentax 67 with the WLF...
I'll add more when I think of them...
dct
perpetual amateur
I own already most of what I need. But what I really want...
Leica M-240
Leica M6
Voigtländer Bessa-T
Epson R-D1s
Contax G2
Minolta Dynax/Maxxum 7
Sony A900
Minolta TC-1
Fujifilm TX-2
Fujifilm GA645Zi
Nikon SP
Nikon Ti28
Bronica RF645
Leica M-240
Leica M6
Voigtländer Bessa-T
Epson R-D1s
Contax G2
Minolta Dynax/Maxxum 7
Sony A900
Minolta TC-1
Fujifilm TX-2
Fujifilm GA645Zi
Nikon SP
Nikon Ti28
Bronica RF645
Harry Lime
Practitioner
Leica MP3 set with Summilux-M ASPH 1.4/50 and Leicavit (black paint).
A few years ago I had an opportunity to buy just the body for a 'reasonable' price and for god knows what reason I did not do it. That was back when everyone thought that film was going to vaporize overnight and you could pick up a mint Blad 5xx with the 80 and A12 for under $500 bucks. In hindsight that was one of the dumber things I've done. Now the MP3 cost a small fortune.
One of these days...
(photo by Daniel Bayer (?) via photo.net)
What else...
Nikon F bodies. The horror. There are so many of them and they are relatively cheap.
Nikon F/F2/F3/FM/FM2/FM3A/F100. Oh, and a black SP for good measure.
Damn you Nikon.
A Minox III, BL, LX or TLX. I think the only thing stopping me on this one is solving the film slitter problem.
I sometimes want a fully decked out Speed Graphic 4x5. Then I remember that I've owned a Linhof III for over 10 years and rarely use it. The Linhof is a marvel of German precision engineering. The Speed Graphic is just plain cool. Usually this dream degenerates in to a three way featuring the Schneider 2.8/150mm and 2.5/178mm Aero Ektar.
I also occasionally lust after the big Mamiya RB/RZ 6x7 kits. Then I remember that I'm not really a fan of the 6x7 aspect ratio, unless I am shooting it in portrait mode. Usually this fantasy drift off to the Voigtlander 667, because it is far more portable. Then I wake up and realize that I already have a few Rolleiflex and Hasselblad bodies.
Sometimes I have this nightmare where Tri-X is discontinued, Ilford tanks and Fuji is only building x-cameras. The big question becomes 'Now what? Glass plates or digital?' If the answer is digital, then the ideal camera would be a Leica M 240 or a Leica Monochrom with the sensor from the 240.
But most of this is day dreaming. I'm determined to stay disciplined and keep my kit a reasonable size. I went through that phase where I lugged around a backpack full of gear and it was a nightmare.
The MP3 really is the only thing I truly desire and would buy if I came across one at a reasonable price. Owning the whole BP MP3/Lux/Leicavit kit would be the jackpot. Two would be even better.
A few years ago I had an opportunity to buy just the body for a 'reasonable' price and for god knows what reason I did not do it. That was back when everyone thought that film was going to vaporize overnight and you could pick up a mint Blad 5xx with the 80 and A12 for under $500 bucks. In hindsight that was one of the dumber things I've done. Now the MP3 cost a small fortune.
One of these days...
(photo by Daniel Bayer (?) via photo.net)
What else...
Nikon F bodies. The horror. There are so many of them and they are relatively cheap.
Nikon F/F2/F3/FM/FM2/FM3A/F100. Oh, and a black SP for good measure.
Damn you Nikon.
A Minox III, BL, LX or TLX. I think the only thing stopping me on this one is solving the film slitter problem.
I sometimes want a fully decked out Speed Graphic 4x5. Then I remember that I've owned a Linhof III for over 10 years and rarely use it. The Linhof is a marvel of German precision engineering. The Speed Graphic is just plain cool. Usually this dream degenerates in to a three way featuring the Schneider 2.8/150mm and 2.5/178mm Aero Ektar.
I also occasionally lust after the big Mamiya RB/RZ 6x7 kits. Then I remember that I'm not really a fan of the 6x7 aspect ratio, unless I am shooting it in portrait mode. Usually this fantasy drift off to the Voigtlander 667, because it is far more portable. Then I wake up and realize that I already have a few Rolleiflex and Hasselblad bodies.
Sometimes I have this nightmare where Tri-X is discontinued, Ilford tanks and Fuji is only building x-cameras. The big question becomes 'Now what? Glass plates or digital?' If the answer is digital, then the ideal camera would be a Leica M 240 or a Leica Monochrom with the sensor from the 240.
But most of this is day dreaming. I'm determined to stay disciplined and keep my kit a reasonable size. I went through that phase where I lugged around a backpack full of gear and it was a nightmare.
The MP3 really is the only thing I truly desire and would buy if I came across one at a reasonable price. Owning the whole BP MP3/Lux/Leicavit kit would be the jackpot. Two would be even better.
Attachments
steveclem
Well-known
This one:
Sid836
Well-known
One step at a time. Now I would like to have an olympus Pen F and I am saving for a mint one. After that it will certainly be that Leica M6-TTL that I am saving for since long ago.
steveclem
Well-known
I'm still waiting for the R-D2 but as long as the analogue operation and dials are there, I'm in !
vitaly66
slightly tilted
Vidax press camera.
sanmich
Veteran
I could get used to a black paint M4
leafster
Established
Leica MP
Leica M7
Leica M7
mani
Well-known
I'm getting to the stage where I've got almost everything that I'd like/need - but I'd love to add:
- a Mamiya 6 (with all 3 lenses)
- and/or a Plaubel Makina 67
After I had one or both of those, I really wouldn't need anything else, but I'd find new cameras to lust after - like some sort of Alpa, and I'd love to try a large format field camera sometime, and then there's those gorgeous Horseman panoramic cameras... talking of which I've always fancied an Xpan. And then there's the Hasselblad SWC. And thinking of other panoramics, there's also...
- a Mamiya 6 (with all 3 lenses)
- and/or a Plaubel Makina 67
After I had one or both of those, I really wouldn't need anything else, but I'd find new cameras to lust after - like some sort of Alpa, and I'd love to try a large format field camera sometime, and then there's those gorgeous Horseman panoramic cameras... talking of which I've always fancied an Xpan. And then there's the Hasselblad SWC. And thinking of other panoramics, there's also...
raid
Dad Photographer
I am at peace with what I now own.
This statement became true since I added the M8,M9, and SWC.
I wanted to try out some excellent digital RF cameras, and then I have always wanted the SWC.
I do not want any other cameras to be added to what I already own.
I am very much enjoying the use of what I now own. Adding more would require that I give up using what I own.
Given my research and teaching schedule each week, there really is no time for more photography than what I am now doing.
As for collecting more cameras, this is not really what I want to do.
This statement became true since I added the M8,M9, and SWC.
I wanted to try out some excellent digital RF cameras, and then I have always wanted the SWC.
I do not want any other cameras to be added to what I already own.
I am very much enjoying the use of what I now own. Adding more would require that I give up using what I own.
Given my research and teaching schedule each week, there really is no time for more photography than what I am now doing.
As for collecting more cameras, this is not really what I want to do.
oilman930
Established
Hasselblad Supreme Wide Angle would make a nice addition to the family.
A Contax I that I could actually use would be nice, really nice actually.
Here's one from left field...an Arriflex 16s movie camera. It's a bit of an oddball in the Arrflex camera family, but since the curtain has come down on shooting regular 8 and super 8 is slipping beneath the waves, I have to move up in format size if I want to keep shooting movie film.
A Contax I that I could actually use would be nice, really nice actually.
Here's one from left field...an Arriflex 16s movie camera. It's a bit of an oddball in the Arrflex camera family, but since the curtain has come down on shooting regular 8 and super 8 is slipping beneath the waves, I have to move up in format size if I want to keep shooting movie film.
Mark A. Fisher
Well-known
1. Mamiya 6 - for no good reason other than I have the 7 and love it, and would like to have a 6x6 version.
2. Rolleiflex 2.8 or 3.5 - Again, no good reason. I love my Yashica-Mat, but would love to experience what all the buzz is about with a Rolleiflex.
3. But what I really, really would love to have is a Hasselblad SWC - I have a 500c/m, but I don't think a 40 or 50 lens does quite the same thing that an SWC does, so I am putting money in the mattress for the SWC waaaaaaay down the road.
2. Rolleiflex 2.8 or 3.5 - Again, no good reason. I love my Yashica-Mat, but would love to experience what all the buzz is about with a Rolleiflex.
3. But what I really, really would love to have is a Hasselblad SWC - I have a 500c/m, but I don't think a 40 or 50 lens does quite the same thing that an SWC does, so I am putting money in the mattress for the SWC waaaaaaay down the road.
stompyq
Well-known
Widelux. Would love to have one but might settle for a horizon.....