shimo-kitasnap
everything is temporary..
Anyone care to share some color and black and white pics taken with this lens?
Thanks,
Thanks,
Didier
"Deed"
All made with a R-D1s. Shot in RAW, converted and partially tweaked in Epson PhotoRAW, some in Photoshop CS3.
Didier
Didier
Last edited:
januaryman
"Flim? You want flim?"
Lovely photos, nice lens.
Didier
"Deed"
Thx Jim. I must admit I tweaked the contrast quite a bit as this lens is not as contrasty as, for example, the 28 Color Skopar I also often use.
Dider
Dider
shimo-kitasnap
everything is temporary..
Wow that's amazing! How's the color rendition? cool? warm? I used to have a canon 35mm f2.8 that had very cool color rendition and high resolution but I sold it because it was difficult to operate on my M6 and I wanted something faster.
KEH
Well-known
Still my favorite shot with this lens. Epson R-D1 in London. Some combination of lens and sensor flare at the top, I am guessing.
Cheers,
Kirk
M. Valdemar
Well-known
Taken at least 30 years ago with a Leotax and a Canon 35mm f2. I don't remember the film or any other details, but I used to carry that camera around with me to make "visual notes" of interesting places in Manhattan:
Last edited:
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
I LOVE both of those last two pics. Awesome.
januaryman
"Flim? You want flim?"
Well, Dider, whatever you did, the effect is phenomenal. Sure I have the 35 Skopar and the 35 Ultron, but now I want to ditch the tiny Skopar and find this Canon. Does this never stop?
David Murphy
Veteran
My only complaint about this lens is they are expensive due in part to threads like this! We all see this and then go hunting for them! A good one seems to get at least $400 now.
Great shots by the way -- really nice!
Great shots by the way -- really nice!
Mackinaw
Think Different
Counterpoint time. If you're a fan of smooth bokeh, you'll hate this lens. The highlights show a very fish-scale like pattern, which was one of the reasons I sold mine. I will admit though, that it's a sharp lens, even wide-open.
Jim B.
Jim B.
ferider
Veteran
I agree with you and I am sure so does Jim - I have seen many great Canon LTM photos from him.
But, like Jim, I sold my 35/2 for the same reason. The Canon 35/1.8 is much better in the OOF department and pretty high res closed down to f4 and further. Or the really great Ultron 35/1.7. Same price ranges.
Roland.
burninfilm
Well-known
Here's some shots I made with a well-used Canon 35mm f2.0 a while back. I've since sold this lens off when I left the Leica scene for a while, but I'll probably find another example to stick on my Canon 7. A great little lens.
[imghttp://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/BurninFilmzd/Show1scopy.jpg[/img]
zuikologist
.........................
All made with a R-D1s. Shot in RAW, converted and partially tweaked in Epson PhotoRAW, some in Photoshop CS3.
Didier
I like these last four. Very nice results.
tennis-joe
Well-known
This picture was taken with the Canon 2.8 35mm. One of our employees was getting a load ready for shipment.
tennis-joe
Well-known
Here is another shot with the Canon lens.
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
I've got the f/1.8 coming to me later this week...once I get some pics, I'll throw 'em in the thread.
