Canon RF lenses on M Leica?

All the Canon screw mount lens are RF coupled that I kown of, all you need is the correct LTM to M adapter to bring up the right frame lines. Check CameraQuest.com for the right adapter.

I have a mint black Cannon 50/1.8 I may be selling soon, it will go up in the classifides section.

Tim

bayerische said:
Hi guys!

Is it possible to use Canon lenses on the Leica M system?

If possible, can someone please explain to me what I need and what lenses actually works. RF coupling?
 
All Canon lens will work and couple fine, you will just need to purchase the correct LTM to M adaptor ring to be sure to bring up the correct frame lines on your M. Adaptors can be purchased off ebay, and at retailers. Voigtlander makes a current ring which is very good. There are three different rings, 28/90mm lenses, 35/135mm lenses and 50/75mm lenses.
 
Watch out for cheap adapters, I got one with a lens I bought. I checked it with my dial calipers and the flange was .043" thick not .039" (1mm) as it should be. These will really mess up your RF coupling, best to get a quality made one.

Tim

cruz said:
You just need screw mount to m adapter like this http://cgi.ebay.com/Lens-Adapter-Leica-Screw-to-M-Cap-35mm-NEW_W0QQitemZ190073940930QQihZ009QQcategoryZ30059QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem every canon rf lens will work without problems afaik
 
I would place a "want to buy"ad here and in photo.net. You will get better overall offers than what you see on ebay. Such old lenses need to be checked to be clean of fungus and lens separation.

I recommend the Canon 28mm/3.5 and the Canon 35mm/2.8. Both are sharp and tiny, giving a nice vintage flavored rendition to images taken with them. A "reasonable price" is around $150~$175 fora clean lens.

Raid
 
!!! GAS inflicting contents!!!

!!! GAS inflicting contents!!!

I have 50/1.2 and 35/2 and that seems enough for me or at least I am trying to convince myself that I don't need anymore stuff 😱 .......
It's useless I don't believe myself. I still need a VC 21/4 a black 3 lug leica m5, with 35 summilux and a wee set of leica glass :bang::bang::bang::bang:
 
I Used to have a 35mm sum, 50mm sum and the 90mm sum.

90mm sum, was too long, never used it, so I sold it.
35mm sum, was too long to be a wide angle, I need atleast a 28mm, looking at the framelines, I now understand that this is what I need.

The 50mm sum, was great, but to slow, so when I got a chance to buy the Konica Hexar set inclusive of a 50mm f1.2 lens it got it.

So currently two bodies, but only one lens, a Canon could be an alternative, and will probably give me a different effect than the 28mm Canon EF lenses that I'm used to.
 
The Canon 25mm can be pricey. Cosina makes great 28mm & 25mm lenses. Easier to find than the Canon lenses. The 28mm M-Hexanon ain't too shabby either.
 
I can happily recommend the Canon 28/3.5 lens. Excellent results with it on my CL.

William
 
I have the Canon 50mm 1.4 "Summilux", It's a marvelous lens both as a picture taker and its build quality. Make sure you get a good quality adapter, either the Leitz originals or one of the CV ones, not a cheap knock-off.
 
Roland or Mark would also support strongly the Canon 50mm/1.5 Sonnar lens. It is also a wonderful lens. I tested such a lens recently and I agree with their assessments.

Raid
 
Bayerische, I had a Canon 28/2.8 with an M3 for 17 years. I did not use it much, partly because I do not much like 28mm and partly because the auxiliary finder was a proprietary Canon one with parallax correction linked to focus. It was possible, of course, to use my 35/3.5 Summaron's finder and frame a little too tightly. Other than the Summaron, my most used lens was a Serenar 50/1.8. Yes, Canon RF lenses only need M adapters for use on an M Leica. For the 28mm you want, you will need an auxiliary finder if your body has no frame lines for that focal length.
 
I also have the Canon 35mm/1.8 which is a sharp little lens with a more modern optical design than my Canon 35mm/2.8. Another excellent Canon lens is the fast and sharp 50mm/1.2. The less expensive Canon 50mm/2.8 is also an excellent and overlooked lens with optical design simmilar to a Tessar lens [in my opinion]. As for a portrait lens, I like the sharp Canon 85mm/1.9 lens. The 2.0 Canon 85mm lens is less expensive but the 1.8 lens is much more expensive.

Raid
 
In my experience, the Canon 35mm f/2 is an excellent lens: fast, sharp, contrasty, compact, lightweight, handles well. It's an excellent match for the M2. It's definitely better than the Canon 35mm f/1.8, although the latter is a decent lens. They're both better for everyday shooting than the Canon 35mm f/1.5, a "superspeed" lens whose design sacrifices other image qualities in the interests of maximum speed. The Canon 50mm f/1.4 is also an excellent lens, fast, sharp, contrasty, not too large or heavy. The Canon 85mm f/1.9 is a decent portrait lens, eminently usable, and reputedly better than the older Canon 85mm f/2. The Canon 85mm f/1.8 has a reputation as an excellent lens, but is hard to find and expensive. All of these Canon lenses are characterized by durable brass and glass construction that keeps them usable 50 years after they were built, provided that they have not been severely abused. Brand-new Leica lenses may be better (my Leica 75mm f/2 manages to combine sharpness and high contrast with smoothness, and handles well), but they are a good deal more expensive. Canon lenses are still good enough to take excellent pictures, and when value for money is factored in, they are an appealing choice for photographers more interested in taking pictures than in flaunting status.
 
I have tried a few Canon lenses on M cameras. Most work fine BUT be careful with longer lenses (in particular due to depth of field) and try them first for proper RF linking / focussing. I have owned both a Canon 85mm f1.9 and a Serenar 135mm f 4.5 and neither would focus properly. However I have also owned a few different 135mm Canon f 3.5 s (both chrome and black) and these have worked well in this department. I dont think its specifically lens related, its to do with variations in individual samples. Other than that they are lovely lens. I have also used a few models and variants of the 50mm f1.8 and f1.4. Great lenses.
 
Back
Top Bottom