TenEleven
Well-known
According to Thiele this should indeed be a Contax Sonnar out of a batch of 2000.I recently acquired this 270* series wartime rigid Sonnar 5cm f2. Only the front element seems to be coated, at least the rear doublet isn't. Coating is not in the best shape and there is some haze inside the triplet group in front of the aperture that I cannot clean. It's between the glass elements.
The mount/outer barrel is interesting, it's heavy – definitely not aluminium – and uses some kind of thread adapter/step down ring to fit the optical block. I haven't seen this kind of late serial rigid 5cm before. I assume it's a lens block from a collapsible lens that was adapted into a rigid shell, possibly sourced from a soviet lens...?!
The main issue is that the lens won't mount. Not on my Contax iia, not on my various Amedeo adapters. The lens was definitely used, but I don't know how anyone would have mounted it. From what I can tell, the guiding rails of the mount are machined too thick. This would be difficult for me to file into shape, so the lens is basically a paper weight. Luckily it was only 65€.
View attachment 4826099
View attachment 4826100
The batch and this lens was finished in late 1942. And I have seen plenty of lenses with spotty coating in that period. I guess supply constraints/labor shortages/etc. were a real issue.
I have had lenses where the "flag" part was a bit too wide and it would not mount on all cameras easily, but I never have seen such a lens where the mount is off entirely. It reminds me a bit of my "Zorky" branded Zonnar Kransogorsky which is also rigid and finished a bit crudely, but mounts. Maybe Brian knows something?
The mounting ring to make the lens into a "rigid" one has been made by Zeiss as early as the 1.4million Sonnars. The good news for you is that you can most likely re-use this mounting adapter ring to "rigidize" another f/2 collapsible Sonnar if you have a shell left over. Or give this one a new lease on life, I guess.