How come Leica can remain a so called 'premium brand' when, if you live in the UK, a pre-packed ploughman's sandwich (cheese, pickle etc) bought from the Co-Op has a picture of a mouse taking pictures with an M of some description printed on the packaging?
While I understand the basic point that you're making, I don't see that this has any actual effect on Leica's ability to "remain a so-called premium brand". For clarity, I'm not a Leica user (not even an aspiring one), so please don't think that I'm simply leaping, reactively, to Leica's defence.
My presumption would be that Leica had nothing to do with the depiction on the packaging. However, whether they did, or didn't, I don't see this affecting the brand status. Most of the world is not even going to
see a piece of sandwich packaging from a UK supermarket. Even if it were, somehow, to be seen by the wider world, how many people, in reality, are suddenly going change their perception (presuming that they have one) of Leica, just because of this?
I'm honestly not indulging in internet-forum-style gainsay here
😉 - I just think that you might be over-reacting a little...
🙂