cleaning my lens, help!

Hi Joe,
Can you post a pic of the rear group. From your original description, it didn't sound like a balsam fault to me. Normally, any separation of the doublet will affect only a small area of the group. It will grow over a period of time but my understanding is that it would be rare for the whole group to separate. All of the balsam faults I have seen appear to look more like an "air bubble" in the middle of the glass. I would have thought it likely that if the balsam had gone right across the surface, the 2 elements would have come apart. A doublet is usually made such that the 2 faces that meet should be identical in a "perfect" lens and make a single element. This is never achieved in practice and you are likely to get newton rings where the 2 elements meet. The purpose of the balsm is mainly to fill the very small imperfections and the "glueing" is more of a useful by product.

Looking at Bill's links, it should be fairly easy to tell if it dissolves in xylene. You should be able to get some at a hobby store. Floquil paints used to be xylene based and I am sure there must be others.

Kim
 
back alley said:
'Sorry for the frustration you must be feeling!'

actually not so frustrated.
taking that lens apart was a thrill for me (plus getting it back together) and if it had been a more expensive lens or in a little better shape i might not have tried.

also, i kinda liked the look of the flare...made the photo take on a 40's look.
i think it might be a great 'landscape' lens or maybe play with some infrared film with it.

and who knows, it might be an ok lens now that i did some clean up on it.

joe

Hey, you're doing better than I am! You don't know anyone else who takes apart the rear element of a Canon 35mm 2.8 LTM lens and puts the lens back together with the f-stops on the bottom, do you? I'm such a moron.

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
 
Joe, why don't you take some different kind of shots with it as it's now, review the results and maybe talk to Ronnie (hoot) later ? He was looking for a very low contrast lens, that Canon could suit him...
 
Back
Top Bottom