contax 1 finder

sp9107sp

Well-known
Local time
4:56 PM
Joined
Jun 26, 2007
Messages
260
on the contax 1's viewfinder, there is usually a finder mask on the side, (near the X in contax) this camera has no slot for it. i've seen one about 4 numbers higher that has the slot and finder,
aa915f904c268e5c5fb92e3879ad642fe727364.JPG
00925e29b54aa276878589403716f9739d7baa8.JPG
 
Great looking camera. Do you have a picture of the top?

Does the camera work?

There are many different versions of the Contax I. A great book about them is "Auf der Spuren der Contax" part 1, from Kuc.

Erik.
 
contax 1

contax 1

the slower speeds are sluggish, rest of the speeds seem to work. the top of the camera has an exposed section
149253b9af4d02e984f5cf0b0e7c4af09fbb5c5.JPG
90e1529b4d2e885f2363928d8a5ffc692d5614f.JPG
2bf3594690bb4f97253489af558ea7108022abe.JPG
 
There are seven basic variants and inevitably there a further detail variations. depends who you refer to.

This is an early version of the first version of the Contax I (if you see what I mean). Identifiers are the dimple in front of the focussing wheel and the long exposed infinity lock.

I'd guess a serial number prefixed by U or AU? 1931.

This is a lovely camera but don't get me started. I have managed to let go all but one of my Contax Is and am almost cured. Ergonomically they are no walk in the park.

They are frustratingly expensive to look after and don't seem to wear their age too well!
 
Ah, one with a dimple, so one of the first! Congrats: quite rare and this one is in beautiful state! Do you have matching nickel lenses with it?
 
Ah thats one very nice early Contax I! And you have a Tessar with it too - a brilliant lens!

The exposed section you mentioned is most likely the focus infinity catch\focus release.
 
Camera serial number is av 10158. On westlicht June 2008 auction is an av10162. Camera has a double pimple. Infinity lock arm is not exposed. I've look online but have not found any photos of a au series contax 1. Are there any websites with photos?

Came with a tessar lens. Lens needs to be cleaned. Has some internal haze.
 
AV is 1932 I believe.

My 'dimple' Contax I is A.U 21904 so should predate yours by a year, U being 1931, but yours has some earlier features.

I realise I have another 'non dimple' body that is A.U but has much later features like tripod folding foot etc.

BUT...I don't think ZI serial numbers at the time ran sequentially, not sure of the logic.

If I remember correctly the A or A. prefix denotes a camera that had been back to the factory for updates/repairs or modifications of some sort.

Understanding the continuous development of this camera while it was in production is a complex area, the Kuc book that Eric meantions is apparently the definitive work
 
I've been looking in Kuc's book. All the seven types of the Contax I he mentions have extendable viewfinder masks. There is no mention of a model without the mask. In that way your camera could be unique. He states however that all kinds of differences are possible.
Your camera seems to be a Version 2.

Erik.
 
I've been looking in Kuc's book. All the seven types of the Contax I he mentions have extendable viewfinder masks. There is no mention of a model without the mask. In that way your camera could be unique. He states however that all kinds of differences are possible.
Your camera seems to be a Version 2.

Erik.

There is something quite unusual about the construction of that front plate (the moulding with 'Contax" on it) it is screwed down over a moulding below that runs right a cross the camera and is brass. There is probably no room for the viewfinder mask. The earliest one I have has this moulding in some sort of alloy. Wouldn't I expect a V2 to have a black plastic type outer edge to its shutter/wind on knob?

I think I know nothing and clearly I know less than I thought...
 
I've been looking in Kuc's book. All the seven types of the Contax I he mentions have extendable viewfinder masks. There is no mention of a model without the mask. In that way your camera could be unique. He states however that all kinds of differences are possible.
Your camera seems to be a Version 2.

Erik.

There is something quite unusual about the construction of that front plate (the moulding with 'Contax" on it) it is screwed down over a moulding below that runs right a cross the camera and is brass. There is probably no room for the viewfinder mask. The earliest one I have has this moulding in some sort of alloy. Wouldn't I expect a V2 to have a black plastic type outer edge to its shutter/wind on knob?

I think I know nothing and clearly I know less than I thought...
 
I've always found the early Tessar shades madness and use a smaller push on one that goes inside aperture ring
 
Interesting pictures! Maybe the sliding mask was removed by the factory on special order by someone who was sure only to use 50mm lenses.

Erik.
 
Hmm, somewhat confirms what I was saying, this is an interesting camera but I am now out of my depth! That single alloy casting right a cross the front with the name plate over it is unlike any of the early Contax Is I have seen.

You have exposed some poorly machined areas (for Zeiss) which must tell a story. I hope we hear from someone who can enlighten us.
 
That single alloy casting right a cross the front with the name plate over it is unlike any of the early Contax Is I have seen.

Kuc's book makes clear that the first two versions of the Contax I have a small front plate, like this camera, but in both versions there is a small half round cutout on the upper right corner to make room for the small knob of the sliding mask. The camera shown here has the small front plate, but without the cutout. That is very special in my opinion.

Erik.
 
Kuc's book makes clear that the first two versions of the Contax I have a small front plate, like this camera, but in both versions there is a small half round cutout on the upper right corner to make room for the small knob of the sliding mask. The camera shown here has the small front plate, but without the cutout. That is very special in my opinion.

Erik.

Agreed! Fascinating camera!

Michael
 
Back
Top Bottom