redisburning
Well-known
never evaluate a lens on someone else's scanning, unless you know them personally.
I have a bit of skill scanning myself and I still evaluate on the negative with a loupe. Maybe if I had a properly high end scanner like a LS-9000 or an Imacon I would use scans, but definitely not my little Minolta (which I like well enough for what I paid for it).
let me show you some examples of how scanning can vary:
bad drugstore:
Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
decent drugstore:
Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
some Boston lab:
Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
ncps (medium format)
Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
my scanner, E6
Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
my scanner, Portra 400
Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
my epson, medium format (sorry no color to show)
butters by redisburning, on Flickr
really scanning makes more difference than the lens when youre dealing with nice glass.
I have a bit of skill scanning myself and I still evaluate on the negative with a loupe. Maybe if I had a properly high end scanner like a LS-9000 or an Imacon I would use scans, but definitely not my little Minolta (which I like well enough for what I paid for it).
let me show you some examples of how scanning can vary:
bad drugstore:
Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
decent drugstore:
Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
some Boston lab:
Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
ncps (medium format)
Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
my scanner, E6
Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
my scanner, Portra 400
Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
my epson, medium format (sorry no color to show)
butters by redisburning, on Flickr
really scanning makes more difference than the lens when youre dealing with nice glass.
David_Manning
Well-known
Good minilab scans from well-exposed Contax T3 shots:
David_Manning
Well-known
I think this was a home scan...it might be a minilab scan. I know it was Kodak BW400CN film...
2wenty
Well-known
Just got the film back from the pro lab (the icon). Besides them trying to screw me on the quality of scans (I paid for medium and they gave me the lowest), they came out good. The camera checks out just fine. After getting good results Im happy. Although I now respect my Ricoh GR1v even more. It never gives me red eye. Looks like Ill have to try the red eye mode on the T3. Also it seems like you have to be a lot more careful when holding the T3 also.
Im going to delete the previous photos above to get them off my photostream.
Dana by Art by 2wenty, on Flickr
Beau, Casey, Dana by Art by 2wenty, on Flickr
Dana by Art by 2wenty, on Flickr
Im going to delete the previous photos above to get them off my photostream.
Dana by Art by 2wenty, on Flickr
Beau, Casey, Dana by Art by 2wenty, on Flickr
Dana by Art by 2wenty, on Flickr
mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
Good to know things worked out for you.
...Mike
...Mike
David_Manning
Well-known
Fantastic...glad it worked out. The T3 is like having a Leica M6 and 35 'chron in your pocket...if the 'chron was 2.8 
CK Dexter Haven
Well-known
Yessir. From me, too.
And, jeez — i would sooooo rather see FILM shots from a T3 than digital files from ANY camera. When you get it right, film has an impact.
I wish i hadn't had to sell the T3s i've enjoyed in my life. And, now the prices are just ridiculous.
2wenty
Well-known
Im gonna go back to the original place that developed my film and ask them to rescan the the film now that I know it was them.
Btw, is there no Contax T3 gallery thread?
Btw, is there no Contax T3 gallery thread?
David_Manning
Well-known
I actually think there is a T3 gallery...I thought there was, anyway...
David_Manning
Well-known
Wow, I guess not...sounds like a great post from you and your new-to-you magic box, the T3