CV 35/1.4 character in a medium format lens?

M

meandihagee

Well-known
Local time
2:07 PM
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
216
hello,

i'm thinking i should shoot a photo project with both a 35mm and a medium format camera. as it requires some fast shooting, i could get this done with the r2a+35/1.4 and for the moments nobody seems to by bothered by a "big gun", i will use the medium format.

i'm set on the mamiya 7 for some time now, but as i realize i would use two systems together, i guess the modern look won't really fit the CV's classic character.

probably the Bessa III/Gf670 would be right there, but i need something wider, probably a 65mm.

to my eyes, the Carl Zeiss Jena, the ones that fit the Pentacon Six and its copies, seems to have a rather similar classic look.

what do you think?
 
meandihagee said:
i'm thinking i should shoot a photo project with both a 35mm and a medium format camera. as it requires some fast shooting, i could get this done with the r2a+35/1.4 and for the moments nobody seems to by bothered by a "big gun", i will use the medium format.

i'm set on the mamiya 7 for some time now, but as i realize i would use two systems together, i guess the modern look won't really fit the CV's classic character.

probably the Bessa III/Gf670 would be right there, but i need something wider, probably a 65mm.

to my eyes, the Carl Zeiss Jena, the ones that fit the Pentacon Six and its copies, seems to have a rather similar classic look.
Click to expand...

The CV 35/f1.4 is not exactly my idea of what I would associate with "classic look".

Maybe you can post a few pictures that illustrate what kind of look you're after.

Carl Zeiss Jena lenses are nice but they limit you to either the Pentacon Six camera, or a Kiev 60, or a modified Kiev 88; also in 65mm there is only a very old Flektogon though that was a bit of a dog even back then. I'm not sure whether it's really worth it. In medium format, the choice is first and foremost the camera system. Maybe you can formulate your ideas a bit more clearly.
 
Get a Hasselblad with the 60mm lens. You'll want the older silver bodied C-Distagon, not the later Black bodied T* C-Distagon or the even newer CF-Distagon.
 
its not me who calls the cv line "classic", it's cosina...

i want to buy a mf system with this in mind - a similarity with cv's so called "classic" line.

Hasselblad, P 6, Mamiya 6/7 hmm
 
Buying into a medium format system to match an average performing 35mm lens doesn't make sense to me at all... If you feel like you can afford a Hasselblad, why not match it up with a Zeiss 35mm lens?
 
Renzsu said:
Buying into a medium format system to match an average performing 35mm lens doesn't make sense to me at all... If you feel like you can afford a Hasselblad, why not match it up with a Zeiss 35mm lens?
Click to expand...

My thoughts EXACTLY!
 
rxmd said:
Carl Zeiss Jena lenses are nice but they limit you to either the Pentacon Six camera, or a Kiev 60, or a modified Kiev 88; also in 65mm there is only a very old Flektogon though that was a bit of a dog even back then. I'm not sure whether it's really worth it. In medium format, the choice is first and foremost the camera system. Maybe you can formulate your ideas a bit more clearly.
Click to expand...
Depends on one's tolerance for minor hassles. Most 645 systems have a Pentacon-6 adapter available which would allow the use of CZJ lenses.
 
ruby.monkey said:
Depends on one's tolerance for minor hassles. Most 645 systems have a Pentacon-6 adapter available which would allow the use of CZJ lenses.
Click to expand...

In that case, to get roughly the same angle of view length you'd have to use the Flektogon 50/f4 (not a bad lens at all, mind you, available multicoated and much better than the Flektogon 65!), and you'd be limited to stopdown operation and metering.

It would probably be more of a budget choice than the Hasselblad-plus-Distagon-60 option.
 
He's asking to replicate one of the cosina "SC" lenses - they have a couple of single coated for an old lens look.

Chris' suggestion of a single coated "C" non-T* 60mm (or 40?) is good, but I'm not sure they draw like a '50s 35mm. Their results are pretty modern looking to me.

The old Isolette/Speedex renders like its 35mm contemporaries, but it's only in a 'normal' focal length. Can't think of a WA folder, though.
 
Last edited:
thanks everybody for the replies.

i guess it's silly to buy a whole system just because it looks somewhat like a 35mm, whichever that may be. but i do need to buy a medium format system and it would be great to use it together with what i have.

however buying another 35mm lens to somehow unify the holy grail of formats seems even more exaggerated and unaffordable at the moment.

maybe it was not a good idea in the first place...
 
Just in terms of basic match (FOV and DOF), you would need a 60/2.8 lens on 6x6. So a Mamiya is not a bad choice, with 55/2.8 on 645.

I were you I would match basic characteristics first, and then worry about bokeh, flare, etc. The Nokton 35/1.4 is a pretty modern lens, even the SC version. The only difference between SC and MC is a little veiling flare when the SC is shot in strong "contre jour" situations.

Roland.
 
Last edited:
ferider said:
Just in terms of basic match (FOV and DOF), you would need a 60/2.8 lens on 6x6. So a Mamiya is not a bad choice, with 55/2.8 on 645.

I were you I would match basic characteristics first, and then worry about bokeh, flare, etc. The Nokton 35/1.4 is a pretty modern lens, even the SC version. The only difference between SC and MC is a little veiling flare when the SC is shot in strong "contre jour" situations.

Roland.
Click to expand...


i prefer 6x7 or 6x6. ideally 6x7, so maybe 65mm + mamiya 7 is still the one i should be after...

the wide lenses on the P Six are like huge trumpets and i would need to get a light meter to work with. i would prefer something that can be used more quickly.

the hasselblad system looks good but it's still pretty heavy and slow to operate. i would still need a meter for it, too
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom