aconcepcion
Newbie
I have owned a CV 35/2.5 PI for the last few months, and am happy with it's performance. Recently, I've been offered a Konica UC 35/2, and am deciding whether it would make sense to get it as well. I will have a chance to try it out for a few days next week. In the meantime, could you share your thoughts on their relative merits, and whether there is any tangible difference between them wide open? Thanks!
sonyleica
Member
You can't be disappointed with 35 UC Hexanon
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=73531
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=73531
__hh
Well-known
The UC-Hex is nearly perfect... it's small, compact, solid, has a great focusing tab/action, and performs exceptionally well at all apertures.
If only it had closer focusing (0.7 rather than 0.9m).
Will put mine up for sale soon because of this.
If only it had closer focusing (0.7 rather than 0.9m).
Will put mine up for sale soon because of this.
Last edited:
Krosya
Konicaze
Hexanon is in a whole different league. If price was right - I'd buy one.
elshaneo
Panographer
The price difference between the Voigtlander and the Konica lens is quite huge if I'm not mistaken. From what I read, the Konica lens is as good as the Leica Summicron lens, and that it's quite rare, that's why it's expensive compared to the Voigtlander lens. Anyway, if money is not a problem, go for it, you can still sell it later if you don't like it 
peter_n
Veteran
I sold mine because of the 0.9M closest focus and the very small tab, so I had usability issues with it. Other than that I thought it was a sublime lens; beautiful images and incredible build quality.The UC-Hex is nearly perfect... it's small, compact, solid, has a great focusing tab/action, and performs exceptionally well at all apertures.
If only it had closer focusing (0.7 rather than 0.9m).
Will put mine up for sale soon because of this.
oldoc
oldoc
I have used them both.
There is NO COMPARISON.
I shoot the UC Hex.
I won't let it go. Some things are worth the price difference.
Take the Hex.
There is NO COMPARISON.
I shoot the UC Hex.
I won't let it go. Some things are worth the price difference.
Take the Hex.
aconcepcion
Newbie
Thanks everyone. From the responses, the UC Hex appears to be well worth a shot. I'll get it for a few days on Tuesday and try it out. Cant'wait!
mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
I doubt you'll be disappointed. So far, my experience has been that all Hexanon lenses are good lenses.Thanks everyone. From the responses, the UC Hex appears to be well worth a shot. I'll get it for a few days on Tuesday and try it out. Cant'wait!
...Mike
jmkelly
rangefinder user
IMO the lens is so good that I can forgive it for only focausing down to 0.9m. WhenI want to pull things in closer I put on a 50mm, or longer. The Uc Hexanon is not a portrait lens, even on a cropped digital.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.