sper
Well-known
Not an RF question I know, sorry, but few groups know as much about CV than you folks so I had to post this question!
I work at B&H in the used department and today a man came in with a CV 20mm ƒ3.5 on his D700 asking about a problem. The lens wouldn't index even after I repeatedly CPU'd it. I even stuck a ZF 50mm ƒ2 Makro-Planar on there and CPU'd it and it worked fine.
He said that he had purchased it a week before, so I told him he was well under warranty and even return policy, so I directed him to the 'new' department for lenses. When he came back he said he returned it, and even another copy wouldn't work so they were sending back the small bunch we had in stock.
So my question is A. Are the CV 20mm ƒ3.5's supposed to index as an AI lens would? and B. What is the state of quality control at CV?
I am a big CV user (R2A, 35 ƒ2.5) and I plan to keep purchasing their rangefinder equipment (would love love love an R4A and a 21 ƒ4) but today's episode made me think a little harder about spending that extra cash for the Zeiss or used Leica lenses.
I work at B&H in the used department and today a man came in with a CV 20mm ƒ3.5 on his D700 asking about a problem. The lens wouldn't index even after I repeatedly CPU'd it. I even stuck a ZF 50mm ƒ2 Makro-Planar on there and CPU'd it and it worked fine.
He said that he had purchased it a week before, so I told him he was well under warranty and even return policy, so I directed him to the 'new' department for lenses. When he came back he said he returned it, and even another copy wouldn't work so they were sending back the small bunch we had in stock.
So my question is A. Are the CV 20mm ƒ3.5's supposed to index as an AI lens would? and B. What is the state of quality control at CV?
I am a big CV user (R2A, 35 ƒ2.5) and I plan to keep purchasing their rangefinder equipment (would love love love an R4A and a 21 ƒ4) but today's episode made me think a little harder about spending that extra cash for the Zeiss or used Leica lenses.